arXiv:2607. 16253v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine learning-based Type 2 diabetes risk prediction models obtain good internal validation results but lose effectiveness in real-world applications due to deficient external testing and fairness assessment.
By Rajveer Singh Pall, Sameer Yadav, Siddharth Bhalerao, Sourabh Sahu, Ritu Ahluwalia, Bhaskar Awadhiya
arXiv:2606. 09860v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) affects roughly 25% of global adults, posing substantial hepatic and cardiovascular risks.
By Xinze Zhang
arXiv:2604. 23954v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) models used in clinical settings are increasingly deployed to support clinical decision-making.
By Ioannis Bilionis, Ricardo C. Berrios, Luis Fernandez-Luque, Carlos Castillo
arXiv:2608. 01820v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Non-invasive blood glucose level (BGL) estimation from photoplethysmography (PPG) holds great promise for wearable health monitoring, but results across studies are hard to compare due to inconsistent datasets, data leakage, and non-standardized evaluation metrics.
By Supraja Ramesh, Markus Neufeld, Michael K\"uttner, Tobias R\"oddiger, Michael Beigl
Non-invasive blood glucose level (BGL) estimation from photoplethysmography (PPG) holds great promise for wearable health monitoring, but results across studies are hard to compare due to inconsistent datasets, data leakage, and non-standardized evaluation metrics. We present the first reproducible, extensible evaluation pipeline and use it to reassess five representative PPG-based BGL methods on published datasets under three increasingly strict data-split protocols: random window-level, participant-aware, and leave-some-participants-out (LSPO).
FairGlucose is a 300‑patient CGM cohort balanced across 12 demographic strata, providing 132,480 forecasting samples and 3,945 behavioral events. Benchmarking 33 models on 2‑hour glucose forecasting revealed that population‑level validation masks significant subgroup disparities, with error ratios ranging from 0.8 to 1.4 and T1D patients experiencing 6 mg/dL higher error than T2D. The study shows that these gaps persist across all models, align with clinically hard cases, and vary with input‑length sensitivity, underscoring the need for subgroup‑disaggregated reporting in digital health AI.
By Junjie Luo, Xuzhe Zhi, Rui Han, Abhimanyu Kumbara, Anand K. Iyer, Mansur E. Shomali, Ritu Agarwal, Guodong Gordon Gao
arXiv:2606. 12699v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) poses an increasing global health threat, demanding effective glycemic assessment to support personalized and improved diabetes care.
By Yifan Gao, Yanmin Gong, Yun Shi, Yuanxiong Guo
arXiv:2606. 06881v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Blood glucose forecasting models are foundational for modern diabetes management systems, as reliable short-term predictions can enable proactive interventions, support automated insulin delivery, and reduce the risk of hypo- and hyperglycemic events.
By Baiying Lu, Zhaohui Liang, Ryan Pontius, Shengpu Tang, Temiloluwa Prioleau
arXiv:2606. 24145v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) can produce clinically fluent recommendations for type 2 diabetes while failing to satisfy guideline constraints or explicitly justify lifestyle-related glycemic claims.
By Saba A. Farahani, Hung Cao, Ramesh Jain, Amir M. Rahmani
arXiv:2507.14077v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms are a critical part of state-of-the-art digital health technology for diabetes management. Yet, acces...
By Temiloluwa Prioleau, Baiying Lu, Yanjun Cui
arXiv:2606. 30702v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Structured tabular data dominates clinical medicine, yet existing benchmarks fail to reflect real-world properties like complex survey sampling, demographic oversampling, and subgroup fairness.
By Federico Felizzi
arXiv:2609.08772v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being investigated for physiological time-series prediction, yet their effectiveness may depend not only...
By Andrea Apicella, Pasquale Arpaia, Matteo Orefice, Andrea Pollastro, Roberto Prevete