arXiv AI

Inference-Time Nash Alignment

arXiv AI
Oct 2

Robust Nash Alignment under Preference Uncertainty

Robust Nash Alignment introduces a game-theoretic framework that seeks a policy with a high worst-case win rate against both an adversarial competitor and any preference kernel within an ambiguity set around a nominal preference. The authors propose a four-player primal-dual proxy game and an optimistic mirror descent-ascent algorithm to efficiently optimize this robust objective, proving convergence guarantees and demonstrating improved performance in controlled tabular games and LLM alignment experiments.

By Shihab Ahmed, Debamita Ghosh, David Tang, Yudan Wang, Alvaro Velasquez, Yue Wang
arXiv AI
Sep 17

A Zeroth-Order Paradigm for LLM Preference Alignment

The paper introduces Comparison-based Preference Optimization (ComPO), a zeroth-order method that aligns large language models with human preferences using comparison oracles instead of direct differentiable loss optimization. It provides theoretical convergence guarantees for both offline and online variants under smoothness, gradient sparsity, and oracle compatibility assumptions, and establishes performance bounds under local coverage and in-distribution reward accuracy. Experiments on several LLMs (Mistral, Llama, Gemma-2, Qwen3, Gemma-3) show that ComPO outperforms existing direct alignment methods, achieving higher length-controlled win rates and diagnostics that suggest mitigation of likelihood displacement.

By Peter Chen, Xi Chen, Wotao Yin, Tianyi Lin