arXiv:2609.08082v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Preference-based fine-tuning methods such as RLHF and DPO require substantial compute and large preference datasets. They also need direct access to th...
By Hadi Hosseini, Debmalya Mandal, Duohan Zhang
arXiv:2601.08777v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Aligning large language models (LLMs) to serve users with heterogeneous and potentially conflicting preferences is a central challenge for pe...
By Yang Cai, Weiqiang Zheng
arXiv:2607. 01715v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing robust preference optimization for language-model alignment mainly studies pairwise supervision and places robustness at the dataset, prompt, or preference-pair level.
By Xudong Wu, Jian Qian, Pangpang Liu, Vaneet Aggarwal, Jiayu Chen
arXiv:2606. 01382v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Preference alignment is central to improving large language models, but standard reward-based formulations can be restrictive when human preferences are cyclic, non-transitive, or otherwise not representable by a scalar reward.
By Tianlong Nan, Xiaopeng Li, Christian Kroer, Tianyi Lin
arXiv:2509. 23102v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has emerged as the standard paradigm for aligning large language models with human preferences.
By Fang Wu, Xu Huang, Weihao Xuan, Zhiwei Zhang, Yijia Xiao, Guancheng Wan, Xiaomin Li, Bing Hu, Peng Xia, Jure Leskovec, Yejin Choi
arXiv:2505. 10892v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Post-training LLMs with RLHF and preference optimization methods (e.
By Akhil Agnihotri, Rahul Jain, Deepak Ramachandran, Zheng Wen