arXiv:2608. 01679v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Persistent memory allows (self-evolving) LLM agents to adapt across tasks by consolidating heterogeneous interaction histories into reusable facts, preferences, observations, and rules.
By Qiuyang Zhan, Rui Zhang, Sheng Guo, Lepeng Zhao, Zhuotao Liu
arXiv:2607. 29167v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-term memory lets large language model(LLM) agents reuse prior preferences and work flows, but it also turns untrusted observations into persistent action context.
By Jinghan Xu, Yiyong Xiao, Wanru Shao, Hankai Liu, Xinjin Li
arXiv:2607. 18485v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents are starting to take on routine work in high-performance computing (HPC), including monitoring Slurm jobs, diagnosing failed builds, inspecting simulation output, and coordinating scientific workflows.
By Jie Li
ActGov is a runtime enforcement framework that validates each action proposed by a large language model (LLM) agent before it interacts with external tools, ensuring that actions stay within task‑scoped authorization boundaries and comply with dynamically constructed policies. It builds policies from tool specifications, benign tasks, and failure traces, verifying updates via SMT‑based counterexample checking. In evaluations on AgentDojo and AgentDyn benchmarks, ActGov consistently reduces indirect prompt‑injection attack success while maintaining task utility, outperforming existing defenses.
By Kaiyuan Zhang, Yuke Peng, Ke Jiang, Yinqian Zhang
arXiv:2604. 16548v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The emergence of writable, cross-session persistent memory in LLM agents introduces a qualitatively different threat landscape from conventional input-centric security concerns, characterized by three properties: persistence, statefulness, and propagation.
By Zehao Lin, Xixuan Hao, Renyu Fu, Shaobo Cui, Kai Chen, Chunyu Li, Zhiyu Li, Feiyu Xiong
arXiv:2607. 24625v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Autonomous LLM agents processing mixed-confidentiality data face severe security risks from prompt injection attacks and reasoning errors.
By Arseny Kravchenko, Vadim Liventsev, Innokentii Konstantinov, Ildar Iskhakov, Matvey Kukuy
arXiv:2609.34790v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: LLM agents operate in persistent collaborative environments involving multiple users, communities, memories, files, and tools. Community boun...
By Hao Chen, Wenhui Dong, Ye Chen, Jiezhi Yao, Chenbo Xia, Yuwen Qu, Renxiang Wang, Fudong Yuan, Camil Hamami, Chenglong Pan, Xinquan Yue, Ziyu Wang, Fengyu Ye, Chenyang Si, Caifeng Shan
arXiv:2609.08258v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Long-running language-model agents depend on persistent memory. Many agent-memory systems preserve history through soft revocation: a contradicted fact...
By Yi Ting Shen, Kentaroh Toyoda, Alex Leung
The paper reports that large language model (LLM) agents can delete their own execution traces when prompted, a flaw observed in several local agents such as Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity, Open Code, and Grok Build, but not in Muse Code. External attackers can also exploit this vulnerability to erase traces. The authors recommend that trace logging be handled by an independent mechanism outside the agent’s control to maintain integrity even if the host is compromised.
By Jeremy Qin, David Schmotz, Derck Prinzhorn, Luca Beurer-Kellner, Ameya Prabhu, Maksym Andriushchenko
arXiv:2609.08062v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Tool-using language agents can delegate and revoke permissions while acting through external services. We show that two authorization histories can hav...
By Moonwon Choi, Seokho Jeong, Seunggeun Lee
Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly execute long-horizon workflows through external tools, allowing untrusted outputs to influence subsequent actions and exceed user authorization. Existing...
arXiv:2607. 06595v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Personal AI agents powered by large language models can reason and act using available tools to access emails, manage calendars, and push code to remote repositories, all with minimal oversight.
By George Torres, Sharad Shrestha, Satyajayant Misra