arXiv:2604. 16548v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The emergence of writable, cross-session persistent memory in LLM agents introduces a qualitatively different threat landscape from conventional input-centric security concerns, characterized by three properties: persistence, statefulness, and propagation.
arXiv:2607. 29167v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-term memory lets large language model(LLM) agents reuse prior preferences and work flows, but it also turns untrusted observations into persistent action context.
arXiv:2607. 27080v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Memory systems allow agents to retain and reuse information from past interactions, but they can also let malicious content persist.
arXiv:2605.01970v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Memory systems enable otherwise stateless LLM agents to persist user information across sessions, but also introduce a new attack surface. Th...
arXiv:2606. 10749v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents are rapidly moving from conversational interfaces to software components that plan, invoke tools, maintain memory, and act on external environments.
Agent Memory Is a Surface for Endogenous Authorization Laundering explores how long‑running LLM agents use persistent memory to track permissions, restrictions, and revocations. The paper shows that when memory misrepresents evolving authorization states, agents can grant themselves authority that the underlying history never permitted, a phenomenon the authors call endogenous authorization laundering. To study this, the authors introduce EAL‑Bench, evaluate several LLMs across domains, and find that memory writers can create false authority in up to 50.2% of cases, which executors then act upon in 98.6% of trials. Two safeguards—requiring stored permissions to be backed by valid source events and tracking permission changes through bounded event sourcing—reduce laundering but also reject more legitimate actions, highlighting a safety‑utility tradeoff.
arXiv:2608. 01679v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Persistent memory allows (self-evolving) LLM agents to adapt across tasks by consolidating heterogeneous interaction histories into reusable facts, preferences, observations, and rules.
Always-on agents are systems whose future behavior depends on durable state accumulated across earlier interactions. We treat them as persistent-state systems: the operative system includes retrievable memories, but also task ledgers, permissions, credentials, commitments, provenance and audit records, shared state, trigger conditions, and externally committed effects linked to those records.
The paper investigates how multi‑step tool‑calling large language model agents can unintentionally create persistent billable state, allowing malicious or compromised tools to generate repeated charges without user credentials. It formalizes the persistent billable‑state boundary, identifies six denial‑of‑wallet attack vectors, and evaluates them with the DOW‑BENCH harness across six model families. The study shows significant cost amplification, demonstrates effective mitigation via deterministic history transformation and host‑side invariants, and highlights the scarcity of existing safeguards in real‑world repositories.
arXiv:2606. 04329v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Memory is a core component of AI agents, enabling them to accumulate knowledge across interactions and improve performance.
The paper introduces CONTINUITY, a framework that ensures secure composition of large language model (LLM) agent controls by using assume‑guarantee contracts and authenticated security contexts. It models each component with signed root grants, provenance commitments, and other mechanisms to carry security context across transitions, formalizing end‑to‑end consequence integrity. A reference verifier and fault‑injection suite demonstrate that the full configuration prevents harmful effects while completing all benign tasks and correctly escalating ambiguous cases.
arXiv:2605. 08442v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We discover that prompt-injection success and tool-execution success are separable safety properties: defenses that block injection do not necessarily block execution, and vice versa.
arXiv:2609. 04875v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-running LLM agents are stateful: beyond the transcript they accrete compressed summaries, plaintext memory, pending tool plans, and, under every serving API, a KV cache.