Benchmarks and evaluation

Leaderboards, eval harnesses and ablations — the contested business of deciding which model is actually better.

24,805 stories · RSS feed

arXiv AI
Jun 2

The Image Reconstruction Game: Drawing Common Ground Through Iterative Multimodal Dialogue

arXiv:2606. 01901v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce the Image Reconstruction Game, a fully automated benchmark in which a vision-language model issues corrective instructions to an image generator across multiple turns, making accumulated common ground directly observable as a rendered image.

By Sherzod Hakimov, Mattia D'Agostini, Ivan Samodelkin, David Schlangen
arXiv AI
Jun 2

Faster Synchronous On-Policy RL via Straggler-Aware Group Sizing

arXiv:2606. 02218v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Synchronous reinforcement learning methods such as Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) provide stable and reproducible on-policy training, but they are highly vulnerable to stragglers, a single unusually long rollout can delay reward computation and parameter updates for the entire group.

By Azal Ahmad Khan, Ammar Ahmed, Zeshan Fayyaz, Sheng Di, Mingyi Hong, Ali Anwar
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2

FinTSB: A Comprehensive and Practical Benchmark for Financial Time Series Forecasting

arXiv:2502. 18834v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Financial time series (FinTS) record the behavior of human-brain-augmented decision-making, capturing valuable historical information that can be leveraged for profitable investment strategies.

By Yifan Hu, Yuante Li, Peiyuan Liu, Yuxia Zhu, Naiqi Li, Tao Dai, Shu-tao Xia, Dawei Cheng, Changjun Jiang
arXiv AI
Jun 2

Mitigating Perceptual Judgment Bias in Multimodal LLM-as-a-Judge via Perceptual Perturbation and Reward Modeling

arXiv:2606. 02578v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent multimodal large language models have demonstrated strong reasoning ability, yet their reliability as automated evaluators remains limited by a critical weakness: when visual evidence conflicts with textual cues, MLLM judges tend to reward plausible narratives over perceptually correct answers.

By Seojeong Park, Jiho Choi, Junyong Kang, Seonho Lee, Jaeyo Shin, Hyunjung Shim