arXiv:2604. 16557v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Current post-training methodologies for adapting Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) generally fall into two paradigms: Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL).
By Yuming Yan, Kai Tang, Sihong Chen, Ke Xu, Dan Hu, Qun Yu, Pengfei Hu
The paper introduces selective adaptation for vision‑language models, questioning whether test‑time adaptation (TTA) should always be applied. By analyzing per‑sample predictions before and after adaptation, the authors find that many adaptations are negligible or even harmful, flipping correct predictions. They propose Cross‑Augmentation Similarity (CAS), which skips adaptation when predictions across augmented views are highly similar, achieving comparable or better accuracy while reducing adaptation by up to 85%.
By Siru Jiang, Yuwei Liang, Jian Liang, Ran He, Tieniu Tan
arXiv:2608.29395v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Vision-language models such as CLIP and SigLIP provide strong zero-shot recognition, but their predictions can degrade when deployed on target data tha...
By Pedram MohajerAnsari, Amir Salarpour, Run Wang, Mert D. Pes\'e
arXiv:2605. 08215v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Visual Foresight VLA (VF-VLA) has become a prominent architectural choice in the recent VLA due to its impressive performance.
By Sangwu Park, Wonjoong Kim, Yeonjun In, Sein Kim, Hongseok Kang, Chanyoung Park
arXiv:2510. 05681v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision-Language-Action models (VLAs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in robot control.
By Suhyeok Jang, Dongyoung Kim, Changyeon Kim, Youngsuk Kim, Jinwoo Shin
arXiv:2607. 03900v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Test-time adaptation (TTA) has emerged as a popular paradigm for improving the performance of vision-language models (e.
By Siru Jiang, Jian Liang, Ran He, Tieniu Tan