Entity-Memory graph retrieval preserves dialogue turns as verbatim memory nodes, links repeated mentions via shared entities, and connects adjacent memories with chronological edges. During retrieval, the system gates through entities, fuses semantics, and performs one‑hop chronological recovery before dense backfill, allowing it to keep neighboring memories that dense cosine ranking might miss. On 1,986 questions from ten LoCoMo conversations, this graph retrieval method increases official evidence recall at top‑k 25 from 79.7468 % to 84.4842 %, with the advantage extending from top‑k 5 to 50, though it does not improve overall final‑answer F1.
By Shumao Sun
arXiv:2609.07093v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enables large language models (LLMs) to answer questions by accessing external knowledge and has been widely a...
By Yifan Wang, Xinkui Lin, Yongxiu Xu, Shen Gao, Ruochen Yang, Kun Huang, Yubin Wang, Jie Wu, Wei Liu, Jian Luan, Hongbo Xu, Shuo Shang
arXiv:2606. 05901v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have fundamentally transformed the landscape of Natural Language Processing.
By Christopher J. Wedge, Joshua Stutter, Danny Dixon, Jacek Ca{\l}a
arXiv:2603.28773v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) frequently generate confident yet factually incorrect content when used for language generation (a phenomenon of...
By Dobrik Georgiev, Kheeran K. Naidu, Alberto Cattaneo, Federico Monti, Carlo Luschi, Daniel Justus
The paper introduces TEMPS, a modular temporal branch that enhances semantic retrievers by adding a temporal scoring component. TEMPS resolves anchored temporal expressions into intervals, matches them to Gaussian distributions, and trains an anchor-date-conditioned encoder using grounding supervision without hand‑labeled data. On three temporal benchmarks, TEMPS improves MRR across all tested backbones and raises R@1 from 19.92 to 25.39 on the TS‑Retriever, surpassing prior temporal state‑of‑the‑art methods.
By Mourad Hassani, Julien Romero, Amel Bouzeghoub, Christian Jacquelinet
arXiv:2606. 28349v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-context reasoning requires models to access, retrieve, and integrate evidence scattered across documents, dialogues, and accumulated interaction histories.
By Zeju Li, Ziyang Zheng, Yizhou Zhou, Qiang Xu
arXiv:2609.22213v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Temporal Knowledge Graph Question Answering (TKGQA) requires answer inference from evidence that is both structurally valid and temporally admissible....
By Xiaokun Guo, Zhen Xu, Dongdong Huo, Yanqiu Zhang, Dongjin Yu, Yu Wang
arXiv:2608. 20083v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Question Answering over Temporal Knowledge Graphs (TKGQA) requires reasoning over time-sensitive facts, yet existing embedding-based methods struggle with multi-step queries due to single-pass reasoning pipelines.
By Brahim Touayouch, Mirette Moawad, Dmitry Akulov
arXiv:2607. 22597v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-hop question answering requires systems to retrieve evidence from multiple documents and connect scattered facts into a coherent reasoning process.
By Hong-Yu An, Yun-Jian Zhang, Chen-Wei Liang, Tian-Yi Zhang, Jian Ding, Yi-Lun Wu, Ao-Bo Li, Wei-Cong Su, Saifullah, Mujiangshan Wang
arXiv:2607. 10562v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating the multi-hop reasoning capabilities of large language models remains a significant challenge.
By JungMin Yun, JuneHyoung Kwon, YoungBin Kim
arXiv:2608. 09779v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Answering complex conditional questions using Large Language Models (LLMs) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) remains a challenge, particularly in domain-specific contexts where general-purpose LLMs and RAG tend to underperform.
By Ghanshyam Verma, Simanta Sarkar, Devishree Pillai, Hotaka Shiokawa, Yourong Xu, Fiona Veazey, Peter Hubbert, Hui Su, Paul Buitelaar
arXiv:2606. 04442v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI systems increasingly need to combine two demanding capabilities: navigating multi-session conversation history and performing deep reading comprehension within long documents.
By Qiyang Xie, Jialun Wu, Xinjie He, Su Liu, Shuai Xiao, Zhiyuan Lin, Weikai Zhou