Hugging Face Trending Papers

The Athlete as a Scientist of One: Agentic Bayesian Experimental Design for Individualized Physiology from Consumer Wearables

Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →

The paper introduces EpiCoach, an agentic system that treats a single athlete as the subject of accountable N‑of‑1 science. It uses a mechanistic digital twin built from wearable data to make probabilistic predictions about future training sessions, and an evidence‑gated hypothesis registry records each claim and its outcomes. Over eighteen months, the system’s predictions were evaluated both retrospectively and prospectively, showing competitive performance and demonstrating a framework for auditable, falsifiable personalization in digital health.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at Hugging Face Trending Papers.

arXiv AI
Oct 31

The Athlete as a Scientist of One: Agentic Bayesian Experimental Design for Individualized Physiology from Consumer Wearables

The paper introduces EpiCoach, an agentic system that treats a single athlete as the subject of accountable N‑of‑1 science. It uses a mechanistic digital twin—comprising a lagged heart‑rate model, a fitness‑fatigue model, and a latent skill state—to generate probabilistic predictions for future training sessions, which are logged in an evidence‑gated hypothesis registry. Over eighteen months, the system’s predictions were evaluated both retrospectively and prospectively, showing improved heart‑rate forecasting and a transparent, auditable loop for personalized training guidance.

By Behnam Moradi
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 24

A Diffusion-Model Subpopulation Digital Twin for Mobile Health Deployment: A Case Study on the HeartSteps Intervention

arXiv:2607. 21403v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mobile-health interventions increasingly use online learning and decision making algorithms to personalize when to nudge users toward healthier behavior, but a poorly designed algorithm can burden and disengage participants.

By Ziping Xu, Yuyi Chang, Chenshun Ni, Nithin Sugavanam, Asim H. Gazi, Pedja Klasnja, Emre Ertin, Susan A. Murphy
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 7

WearableQA: A Benchmark for Health Reasoning over Real-World Wearable Data

WearableQA is a new benchmark that tests AI systems on health reasoning using real-world wearable data from 200 users, each with up to 500 days of daily measurements. It contains 4,084 ten‑option multiple‑choice questions derived from wearable time series, blood biomarkers, and demographics, and is organized into 16 question types that distinguish data‑driven computation from physiological interpretation and single‑signal from cross‑signal reasoning. Evaluation of 14 large language models shows wide performance gaps, indicating that the benchmark remains challenging and useful for diagnosing model capabilities.

By Ji Soo Lee, Xilun Chen, Pierce Chuang, Ashish Shenoy, Jason Wei, Dohwan Ko, Hyunwoo J. Kim, Benoit Corda
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 22

A Patient World Model for Early Forecasting of Digital Health Campaign Outcomes: Capabilities and Limits

The paper introduces a compact patient world model that forecasts digital health campaign outcomes by maintaining a latent state per patient and learning exposure‑conditioned dynamics. Evaluated on a large US campaign dataset, the model predicts new‑to‑brand prescription volume with low relative error (2.9% at week‑4 cutoff) compared to much higher errors from baseline classifiers. The study also shows that dense next‑exposure supervision is crucial for accurate forecasts when conversions are rare and highlights limitations in interpreting exposure‑conditioned rollouts causally.

By Yunlong Wang
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 28

BALMS: Benchmarking Agentic LLMs for Longitudinal Mental Health Sensing

BALMS is a benchmark for evaluating large language model (LLM) agents that analyze longitudinal wearable data to predict mental‑health wellbeing scores and generate evidence‑grounded rationales. It covers three real‑world datasets, two task families (score prediction and rationale generation), and tests five LLM backbones across open‑ and closed‑source paradigms. The study finds that zero‑shot agents rarely beat a simple mean baseline, and while chain‑of‑thought prompting helps reasoning, it does not ensure temporal grounding or numerical accuracy.

By Yu Yvonne Wu, Arvind Pillai, Yuliang Chen, Yuwei Zhang, Sudarshan Regmi, Tess Z. Griffin, Michael V. Heinz, Lisa A. Marsch, Nicholas C. Jacobson, Andrew Campbell