WearableQA is a new benchmark that tests AI systems on health reasoning using real-world wearable data from 200 users, each with up to 500 days of daily measurements. It contains 4,084 ten‑option multiple‑choice questions derived from wearable time series, blood biomarkers, and demographics, and is organized into 16 question types that distinguish data‑driven computation from physiological interpretation and single‑signal from cross‑signal reasoning. Evaluation of 14 large language models shows wide performance gaps, indicating that the benchmark remains challenging and useful for diagnosing model capabilities.
arXiv:2605. 22759v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: While ubiquitous wearable sensors capture a wealth of behavioral and physiological information, effectively transforming these signals into personalized health insights is challenging.
arXiv:2609.06976v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As medical wearables become integrated into daily chronic disease care, effectively interpreting longitudinal monitoring data is essential for patients...
arXiv:2606. 18147v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language models are remarkably capable at medical question answering, in some cases surpassing the accuracy of general physicians.
arXiv:2607. 16235v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Mobile and wearable devices offer an unprecedented opportunity for continuous, passive health monitoring and active health coaching.
arXiv:2605. 29483v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Wearable devices enable continuous monitoring of physiological signals such as ECG and PPG, but existing mHealth systems are largely limited to task-specific prediction pipelines or reactive question answering over static summaries.
BALMS is a benchmark for evaluating large language model (LLM) agents that analyze longitudinal wearable data to predict mental‑health wellbeing scores and generate evidence‑grounded rationales. It covers three real‑world datasets, two task families (score prediction and rationale generation), and tests five LLM backbones across open‑ and closed‑source paradigms. The study finds that zero‑shot agents rarely beat a simple mean baseline, and while chain‑of‑thought prompting helps reasoning, it does not ensure temporal grounding or numerical accuracy.
arXiv:2601.13880v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Personalized lifestyle health analysis requires long-horizon, multi-dimensional reasoning over heterogeneous lifestyle signals, and recent advances...
arXiv:2603. 06638v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The rise of large language models (LLMs) has shifted time series analysis from narrow analytics to general-purpose reasoning.
arXiv:2607. 27635v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Wearable sensors continuously capture fine-grained multivariate time-series data, providing opportunities to model behavioural patterns associated with health outcomes.
arXiv:2606. 00345v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Wearable and mobile sensing technologies enable continuous monitoring of human behavior and health in real-world settings.
arXiv:2606. 12699v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) poses an increasing global health threat, demanding effective glycemic assessment to support personalized and improved diabetes care.
The paper introduces Affective Agent, a three‑layer reference architecture designed for on‑device personalized intervention reasoning in wearable systems. It integrates a compact sub‑billion‑parameter language model with physiological data, context, and user history to determine when and how to intervene, all without cloud support or per‑user retraining. The architecture’s perception, personalization, and reasoning layers adapt through host‑managed structured memory evolution, and evaluation on simulated indoor environmental quality scenarios shows that memory‑driven personalization and two‑pass reasoning enhance intervention decisions.