arXiv AI
$\texttt{findr}$: Transparent and Fair Credit Risk Decisions through Semi-Structured Regressions
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 25
$\texttt{findr}$: Transparent and Fair Credit Risk Decisions through Semi-Structured Regressions
Credit risk models increasingly need to combine predictive accuracy with transparent explanations and auditable fairness constraints. Logistic regression remains attractive because its coefficients ar...
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 16
Foundation Models for Credit Risk Prediction: A Game Changer?
arXiv:2605. 18147v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Predictive models play a pivotal role in credit risk management, guiding critical decisions through accurate estimation of default probabilities and losses.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 9
A Distributionally Robust Optimisation Approach to Fair Credit Scoring
arXiv:2402. 01811v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Credit scoring has been catalogued by the European Commission and the Executive Office of the US President as a high-risk classification task, in light of the potential harms of making loan approval decisions based on models that would be biased against certain groups.
arXiv Statistics ML
Sep 10
Adversarial Training for Tabular Credit Scoring: A Multi-Attack Robustness Evaluation in P2P Lending
arXiv:2609.09945v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine learning-based credit scoring is increasingly central to Peer-to-Peer (P2P) lending, yet its resilience to adversarial manipulation, where ap...
arXiv AI
Aug 19
Communicating Credit Risk with Large Language Models: Evaluation of Explanations from Standard and Alternative Data-Based Models
The study investigates whether Large Language Models (LLMs) can translate technical explanations from credit risk models into stakeholder-friendly narratives. Using Freddie Mac loan data, the authors compare standard tabular models (XGBoost + SHAP) with alternative data pipelines (GNN + GNNExplainer and a bimodal mix) and generate explanations with three LLM configurations: a small fine‑tuned Gemma 3 4B, a large fine‑tuned DeepSeek R1 70B, and a zero‑shot Gemini 2.5. Findings show that the quality of explanations is more dependent on the evidence representation than on the LLM, that narratives reliably identify influential factors but are less consistent about the direction of influence, and that credit professionals demand higher evidentiary standards than non‑professionals.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 15
Learning an Interpretable Risk Scoring System for Maximizing Decision Net Benefit
arXiv:2604. 04241v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Risk scoring systems are widely used in high-stakes domains to assist decision-making.