arXiv AI By Ben Rachmut, Ning Zhang, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik, William Yeoh

Symbolic Guidance for LLM Agents in Distributed Multiagent Coordination

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces the Symbolic Guidance Taxonomy (SGT) to regulate the autonomy of large language model agents in distributed multi‑agent coordination. By providing symbolic guidance—ranging from open‑ended reasoning to fully prescriptive algorithmic steps—the authors find that intermediate levels of autonomy consistently outperform both unguided agents and fully prescriptive specifications. These results suggest that carefully controlling agent autonomy is a crucial design principle for effective LLM‑based coordination.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
1d ago

Zero-Shot Coordination among LLM Agents

The paper investigates zero‑shot coordination (ZSC) among large language model (LLM) agents, a scenario where independently developed agents must coordinate without prior shared scaffolding. Experiments in minimal, controlled environments reveal that current frontier LLMs struggle to coordinate, mainly due to limited understanding of the coordination problem and weak reasoning about partners’ beliefs. The authors introduce Coordination‑Friendly Definitions (CFDs) as a principled, automatically discoverable approach to improve robust coordination among LLM agents.

By Adrian Hayler, Shashank Reddy Chirra, Andrei Lupu, Johannes Forkel, Bidipta Sarkar, Siheng Feng, Jakob Foerster
arXiv AI
Oct 19

Structured Authority Injection: Persistent Human Control for LLM Agents via Typed MCP Overrides

Structured Authority Injection (SAI) is a protocol that enables persistent human control over large language model (LLM) agents by routing operator corrections through typed, schema‑validated Model Context Protocol (MCP) tool calls and maintaining a ranked authority context in each prompt. It defines three override classes—Constraint, Priority, and Strategy—each with distinct persistence semantics and a strict precedence order enforced via a directed authority channel. Evaluations across nine LLMs and eight scenarios show reduced ambiguous directive interpretation, mitigated authority decay, and lower prompt overhead in the strongest models, though benefits vary by model.

By Ryan Tran, YueMing Zhang, Lingfeng Tao, Nan Yang, Shengjie Xu, Yu Yin, Shuai Xu, Wenlu Zhang, Hailu Xu
arXiv AI
Aug 28

From Atomic to Agentic: Towards Interpretable Evaluation of LLMs' Agentic Mathematical Capabilities

The paper introduces a new benchmark that evaluates large language models (LLMs) on their agentic mathematical reasoning rather than just final answers. It aligns problem‑solving behaviors with a taxonomy of reusable mathematical atomic capabilities and includes planning, action, and feedback tasks in both textual and multimodal settings. Experiments show that models with similar end‑to‑end accuracy can have very different agentic profiles, highlighting the importance of process‑level evaluation.

By Jiayi Kuang, Yinghui Li, Yunze Song, Keyu Chen, Zhifeng Shen, Yangning Li, Yidong Wang, Di Yin, Ruizhi Qiao, Xing Sun, Kai Jin, Ying Shen, Liang Lin, Philip S. Yu
arXiv AI
Oct 15

Degrees of Freedom in Multi-Agent Coordination: Between Centralized and Decentralized Regimes

The paper introduces Degrees of Freedom (DoF), a continuous framework that measures how much decision-making is delegated to agents in large language model–based multi‑agent systems. By varying DoF, the authors explore a spectrum between fully centralized and fully decentralized coordination, finding that intermediate settings often outperform both extremes across several task domains. The study shows that task characteristics and retained experience influence how coordination granularity affects performance, offering empirical guidance for designing hybrid coordination regimes.

By Yiqing Peng, Hehai Lin, Zixuan Wang, Dongyi Zhang, Zhengjie Zhu, Yi Han, Yangyang Zheng, Hao Wang, Qian Li, Chengwei Qin