arXiv:2604. 17612v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multi-agent systems built on large language models (LLMs) are difficult to reason about.
arXiv:2606. 14790v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-based multi-agent systems increasingly coordinate planning, reasoning, tool use, and human interaction, yet their reliability remains limited.
The paper introduces control‑data flow separation to improve prompt optimization in multi‑agent large language model systems. By representing execution protocols as typed, validated program objects and keeping task‑relevant content as unstructured language, the method prevents prompt edits from corrupting critical routing, formatting, or termination signals. Experiments on synthetic reasoning, collaborative review generation, and insurance rating workflows show that this approach maintains 100% protocol validity while consistently enhancing task performance.
arXiv:2606. 29601v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Current languages for specifying multiagent protocols either over-constrain protocol enactments or complicate capturing their meanings.
arXiv:2606. 15874v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Every major LLM agent framework gives the LLM the role of orchestrator; the model decides what to do next, when to call tools, and when to stop.
arXiv:2607. 07989v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) based multi-agent systems enable complex problem solving through coordinated reasoning and action, but their distributed structure also introduces new challenges in diagnosing system-level failures.
arXiv:2606. 23797v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Graph and multi-agent orchestration frameworks make production large language model (LLM) workflows practical, but they do not by themselves solve conversational continuity when users maintain several interdependent objectives.
arXiv:2606. 06523v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Equipping Large Language Models (LLMs) to execute reliable multi-step workflows has become a central challenge in artificial intelligence.
arXiv:2609.05774v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent multi-agent LLM systems increasingly rely on graph-structured communication to coordinate specialized agents. We revisit multi-agent orchestrati...
arXiv:2608.29971v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As agentic systems evolve into complex multi agent orchestration workflows, there is a growing and critical need for systematic frameworks that measure...
The paper introduces Epistemic Probabilistic Language Agents (EPLA), a neuro‑symbolic architecture designed to enable coordination among multi‑agent large language models (LLMs) under uncertainty. EPLA employs a Symbolic Guard that provides structured diagnostic feedback, allowing the LLM to generate typed actions while the Guard controls their execution against an authoritative symbolic state. The authors formalize an epistemic layer using gossip testbeds and epistemic lottery gossip models, combining view‑based call histories with agent‑indexed probability weights to address gaps in social behavior and coordination mechanisms for agentic LLMs.
arXiv:2607. 06157v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deliberation plays a crucial role in collaboration; when humans work together, they naturally engage in communication to align information and reach an agreement.
The paper argues that many failures in large language model–based multi‑agent systems stem from concurrency control issues rather than coordination or communication problems. It highlights how concurrent reads and writes to shared state, coupled with long inference windows, lead to stale data, lost updates, and inconsistent outcomes. The authors propose that MAS frameworks incorporate explicit concurrency controls—such as conflict detection, isolation guarantees, and structured resource access—to make concurrency a primary design concern.