arXiv AI By Ryan Tran, YueMing Zhang, Lingfeng Tao, Nan Yang, Shengjie Xu, Yu Yin, Shuai Xu, Wenlu Zhang, Hailu Xu

Structured Authority Injection: Persistent Human Control for LLM Agents via Typed MCP Overrides

Read the original on arXiv AI →

Structured Authority Injection (SAI) is a protocol that enables persistent human control over large language model (LLM) agents by routing operator corrections through typed, schema‑validated Model Context Protocol (MCP) tool calls and maintaining a ranked authority context in each prompt. It defines three override classes—Constraint, Priority, and Strategy—each with distinct persistence semantics and a strict precedence order enforced via a directed authority channel. Evaluations across nine LLMs and eight scenarios show reduced ambiguous directive interpretation, mitigated authority decay, and lower prompt overhead in the strongest models, though benefits vary by model.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Oct 26

Symbolic Guidance for LLM Agents in Distributed Multiagent Coordination

The paper introduces the Symbolic Guidance Taxonomy (SGT) to regulate the autonomy of large language model agents in distributed multi‑agent coordination. By providing symbolic guidance—ranging from open‑ended reasoning to fully prescriptive algorithmic steps—the authors find that intermediate levels of autonomy consistently outperform both unguided agents and fully prescriptive specifications. These results suggest that carefully controlling agent autonomy is a crucial design principle for effective LLM‑based coordination.

By Ben Rachmut, Ning Zhang, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik, William Yeoh
arXiv AI
Oct 19

From Natural Language Intent to Executable Control: Hierarchical Feedback-Guided LLM Planning for Multi-component Cyber-Physical Systems

The paper introduces a hierarchical feedback framework that guides large language models (LLMs) to produce executable plans for cyber‑physical systems (CPSs) from natural language commands. It prompts LLMs to generate both a structured task plan and signal temporal logic (STL) constraints, then uses a sound algorithm to detect contradictions and provide feedback for plan revision. At execution time, diagnostic information from failed control synthesis—such as violated constraints and conflicting component assignments—is fed back to the LLM to enable task replanning, achieving an 87.9% success rate on seven heterogeneous CPS scenarios.

By Jinglin Dai, Jiawan Wang, Ruiqi Hong, Lei Bu
arXiv Machine Learning
1d ago

SecureGARD: Dynamic Ontology-Guided Governance for Secure Tool-Using LLM Agents

SecureGARD is a dynamic ontology‑guided governance framework designed to secure tool‑using large language model agents. It grounds heterogeneous tool calls in a shared semantic representation, using an executable ontology combined with episode‑level task state to make deterministic ready, waiting, and forbidden decisions. The system evolves its ontology offline from verified training executions, ensuring logical consistency and protecting entailments, and achieves a 0% attack success rate across multiple benchmarks while improving task utility under attack.

By Guoqin Xiong, Shengtao Wen, Xiang Chen, Xinyi Zeng, Zhaoxin Fan, Wei Ye, Xiaofeng Cao, Sheng-Jun Huang
arXiv Computation and Language
1d ago

Multi-User Large Language Model Agents

arXiv:2604.08567v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) and LLM-based agents are increasingly deployed as assistants in planning and decision making, yet most existing system...

By Shu Yang, Shenzhe Zhu, Hao Zhu, Jos\'e Ram\'on Enr\'iquez, Di Wang, Alex Pentland, Michiel A. Bakker, Jiaxin Pei
arXiv AI
Sep 23

ActGov: Governing LLM Agent Actions via Policy-Constrained Validation

ActGov is a runtime enforcement framework that validates each action proposed by a large language model (LLM) agent before it interacts with external tools, ensuring that actions stay within task‑scoped authorization boundaries and comply with dynamically constructed policies. It builds policies from tool specifications, benign tasks, and failure traces, verifying updates via SMT‑based counterexample checking. In evaluations on AgentDojo and AgentDyn benchmarks, ActGov consistently reduces indirect prompt‑injection attack success while maintaining task utility, outperforming existing defenses.

By Kaiyuan Zhang, Yuke Peng, Ke Jiang, Yinqian Zhang