arXiv Machine Learning By Rostyslav Sipakov

Statevector-to-Hardware Reconstruction of a Four-Qubit ZZ Quantum Kernel: A Single-Backend Case Study of Three Execution Jobs

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The study reports on three separate executions of a four‑qubit ZZ feature map on the ibm_fez backend, each using 1024 shots per circuit. The authors compare the resulting hardware‑reconstructed Gram matrices to an exact statevector reference, finding off‑diagonal RMSE values of 0.0878, 0.0864, and 0.0427 for the baseline, dynamical decoupling, and gate‑twirling jobs respectively, and centered kernel alignment scores ranging from 0.933 to 0.989. The gate‑twirling job shows the smallest deviation across all metrics, while the baseline job’s contrasts remain stable under deletion‑stable diagnostics; the study notes that sampling alone cannot explain the observed errors and that implementation fidelity and task relevance are distinct diagnostic axes.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Jul 14

MDQEC-QAS: Meta-Decoding for Quantum Error Correction with Hardware-Aware VQC Search and Confidence-Gated Recovery

arXiv:2607. 10707v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We propose a unified meta-decoding framework for quantum error correction that learns syndrome-to-recovery mappings across multiple stabilizer codes and noise settings, without requiring separate decoders for each configuration.

By Prashant Kumar Choudhary, Nouhaila Innan, Muhammad Shafique, Rajeev Singh
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 17

QEMScore: How Much Does the Measurement Add to Learned Quantum Error Mitigation?

The paper introduces QEMScore, a metric that compares learned quantum error mitigators to capacity‑matched controls that do not use measurement data. Using simulated circuits with exact ideal answers, the study finds that many mitigators gain little from measurement inputs, with a plain polynomial model often outperforming them. On real hardware data, however, measurement inputs can provide predictive benefits, highlighting that performance depends on representation and protocol specifics.

By Yue Zhao, Huayue Gu, Yushun Dong, Xiyang Hu