arXiv Machine Learning By Rostyslav Sipakov

Statevector-Referenced Geometry Survival of a Four-Qubit ZZ Quantum Kernel on IBM Quantum Hardware: A Fixed-Subset Diagnostic Across Three Execution Configurations

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2607. 20377v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantum-kernel methods encode a dataset's geometry in a Gram matrix, so learning claims on hardware kernels assume the intended geometry survives execution.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 7

Statevector-to-Hardware Reconstruction of a Four-Qubit ZZ Quantum Kernel: A Single-Backend Case Study of Three Execution Jobs

The study reports on three separate executions of a four‑qubit ZZ feature map on the ibm_fez backend, each using 1024 shots per circuit. The authors compare the resulting hardware‑reconstructed Gram matrices to an exact statevector reference, finding off‑diagonal RMSE values of 0.0878, 0.0864, and 0.0427 for the baseline, dynamical decoupling, and gate‑twirling jobs respectively, and centered kernel alignment scores ranging from 0.933 to 0.989. The gate‑twirling job shows the smallest deviation across all metrics, while the baseline job’s contrasts remain stable under deletion‑stable diagnostics; the study notes that sampling alone cannot explain the observed errors and that implementation fidelity and task relevance are distinct diagnostic axes.

By Rostyslav Sipakov
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 7

Impact of Data Loss in Postprocessing on Training and Inference of Quantum Neural Networks

The paper investigates how postprocessing routines in quantum neural network software can cause significant data loss when run on large quantum hardware. In a case study of Qiskit’s “SamplerQNN”, a filter that assumes measurement bit‑strings are in virtual qubit space removed 85–99.6% of valid shots on IBM backends, leading to unnormalised probability vectors and distorted predictions. This loss caused inference accuracy to drop from 0.94 to 0.39 and compressed training loss signals by 22–27×, severely reducing optimizer sensitivity. The authors implemented a layout‑based marginalisation fix that was merged into the library to make “SamplerQNN” forward‑compatible with current and future hardware.

By Soraya V. Panambalom, Edoardo Altamura, Nick Chancellor, Jonte R. Hance
arXiv AI
Jul 14

MDQEC-QAS: Meta-Decoding for Quantum Error Correction with Hardware-Aware VQC Search and Confidence-Gated Recovery

arXiv:2607. 10707v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We propose a unified meta-decoding framework for quantum error correction that learns syndrome-to-recovery mappings across multiple stabilizer codes and noise settings, without requiring separate decoders for each configuration.

By Prashant Kumar Choudhary, Nouhaila Innan, Muhammad Shafique, Rajeev Singh
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 24

Quantum Adaptive Self-Attention for Quantum Transformer Models

arXiv:2504. 05336v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: A recurring weakness in quantum machine learning (QML) is that reported ``quantum advantages'' are seldom tested against a \emph{capacity-matched} classical control, leaving it unclear whether a gain comes from the quantum substrate or from the architectural change that accompanies it.

By Chi-Sheng Chen, En-Jui Kuo