arXiv:2607. 20377v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantum-kernel methods encode a dataset's geometry in a Gram matrix, so learning claims on hardware kernels assume the intended geometry survives execution.
By Rostyslav Sipakov
The study reports on three separate executions of a four‑qubit ZZ feature map on the ibm_fez backend, each using 1024 shots per circuit. The authors compare the resulting hardware‑reconstructed Gram matrices to an exact statevector reference, finding off‑diagonal RMSE values of 0.0878, 0.0864, and 0.0427 for the baseline, dynamical decoupling, and gate‑twirling jobs respectively, and centered kernel alignment scores ranging from 0.933 to 0.989. The gate‑twirling job shows the smallest deviation across all metrics, while the baseline job’s contrasts remain stable under deletion‑stable diagnostics; the study notes that sampling alone cannot explain the observed errors and that implementation fidelity and task relevance are distinct diagnostic axes.
By Rostyslav Sipakov
arXiv:2607. 19782v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Kernel methods are powerful tools in machine learning but commonly used full-Gram kernels face three key limitations: (1) quadratic scaling with training set size; (2) the use of fixed, non-trainable kernels; and (3) the absence of an intrinsic formulation for multiclass classification.
By Kilian Tscharke, Pascal Debus
arXiv:2510. 03389v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Current quantum computers require algorithms that use limited resources economically.
By Jonas J\"ager, Philipp Els\"asser, Elham Torabian
arXiv:2605. 30952v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Two recent results have reshaped quantum Gaussian processes (QGPs).
By Jian Xu, Chao Li, Guang Lin, Yuning Qiu, Delu Zeng, John Paisley, Qibin Zhao
arXiv:2607. 11936v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hyperdimensional Computing (HDC) represents symbols using high-dimensional hypervectors of dimension $D$.
By Sanggeon Yun, Hyunwoo Oh, Ryozo Masukawa, Raheeb Hassan, Mohsen Imani
arXiv:2606. 13422v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We develop theoretical foundations for a practical quantum-advantage mechanism in quantum-informed machine learning for chaotic dynamical systems.
By Maida Wang, Xiao Xue, Minh Chung, Peter V. Coveney
arXiv:2504. 05336v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: A recurring weakness in quantum machine learning (QML) is that reported ``quantum advantages'' are seldom tested against a \emph{capacity-matched} classical control, leaving it unclear whether a gain comes from the quantum substrate or from the architectural change that accompanies it.
By Chi-Sheng Chen, En-Jui Kuo
arXiv:2608.24631v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Similarity in many decision systems is governed not by distance alone but by interactions among variables. In fraud and anomaly detection, small loca...
By Hanqiu Peng, Jianlong Lu, Ying Chen
arXiv:2606. 20183v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent quantum vision models-quantum vision transformers and quantum convolutional networks-report two striking but unexplained empirical phenomena: (i) ansatze with more, or more uniformly distributed, entanglement generalize better, and (ii) injecting quantum noise can improve test accuracy rather than degrade it.
By Jian Xu, Delu Zeng, John Paisley, Qibin Zhao
The paper investigates the role of quantum computing in network‑security classification through two experiments. First, it evaluates near‑term quantum‑kernel support vector machines on datasets such as KDD Cup 1999, CICIDS2017, and BoT‑IoT, finding that quantum kernels can match or sometimes improve classical baselines, though classical RBF kernels often remain stronger. Second, it explores long‑term memory efficiency using quantum oracle sketching (QOS), showing that quantum methods can achieve comparable accuracy with a smaller effective memory footprint than explicit storage, suggesting a potential advantage in memory‑efficient data access for streaming classification tasks.
By Yuqing Li, Poonam Bala Nehru, Yunpeng Zhang, Danindu Gammanpilage, Xin Jin, Zeguan Wu, Junyu Liu
The paper investigates how postprocessing routines in quantum neural network software can inadvertently discard a large portion of valid measurement data when run on real quantum hardware. In a case study of Qiskit’s “SamplerQNN”, a filter that assumes virtual qubit space caused 85–99.6% of measurement shots to be lost on IBM backends, leading to unnormalised probability vectors, degraded inference accuracy (from 0.94 to 0.39), and a 22–27× compression of the training loss signal. The authors provide a layout‑based marginalisation fix that has been merged into the library to ensure forward‑compatibility with current and future hardware.