arXiv Machine Learning By Yue Zhao, Huayue Gu, Yushun Dong, Xiyang Hu

QEMScore: How Much Does the Measurement Add to Learned Quantum Error Mitigation?

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper introduces QEMScore, a metric that compares learned quantum error mitigators to capacity‑matched controls that do not use measurement data. Using simulated circuits with exact ideal answers, the study finds that many mitigators gain little from measurement inputs, with a plain polynomial model often outperforming them. On real hardware data, however, measurement inputs can provide predictive benefits, highlighting that performance depends on representation and protocol specifics.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Jul 14

MDQEC-QAS: Meta-Decoding for Quantum Error Correction with Hardware-Aware VQC Search and Confidence-Gated Recovery

arXiv:2607. 10707v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We propose a unified meta-decoding framework for quantum error correction that learns syndrome-to-recovery mappings across multiple stabilizer codes and noise settings, without requiring separate decoders for each configuration.

By Prashant Kumar Choudhary, Nouhaila Innan, Muhammad Shafique, Rajeev Singh
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 24

Quantum Adaptive Self-Attention for Quantum Transformer Models

arXiv:2504. 05336v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: A recurring weakness in quantum machine learning (QML) is that reported ``quantum advantages'' are seldom tested against a \emph{capacity-matched} classical control, leaving it unclear whether a gain comes from the quantum substrate or from the architectural change that accompanies it.

By Chi-Sheng Chen, En-Jui Kuo