arXiv AI August 24, 2026 By Zhicheng Lin

Six misconceptions about large language models: A minimal model and diagnostic taxonomy

The article presents a minimal working model for large language model (LLM) systems, emphasizing four key distinctions—pretraining vs. deployment, distribution vs. samples, types of memory, and task competence vs. agency. Using this framework, it diagnoses six common misconceptions about LLMs (next‑token prediction, regression to the mean, training‑data regurgitation, model memory, alignment, and understanding), explaining what each misconception captures correctly, where it conflates distinctions, and the implications for evaluation, design, and governance. The model is applied to AI policy language, illustrating how policy can misrepresent these distinctions and offering a diagnostic toolkit to correct such errors.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI

Jul 3

A Practice Auditing Framework for Large Language Model Use: Collective Empiricism, Pseudo-Rational Cognition, and Governance of AI-Generated Content

arXiv:2607. 01248v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models are increasingly used for knowledge acquisition, code generation, academic writing, and agent-based automation.

By Yang Zhao, Yingshuo Li, Zeyu Zhang

llms agents

arXiv Machine Learning

1d ago

Emergent Abilities in Large Language Models: A Survey

Emergent Abilities in Large Language Models: A Survey reviews how scaling LLMs leads to previously unseen capabilities such as advanced reasoning, in-context learning, coding, and problem-solving. The paper critically examines definitions, inconsistencies, and the conditions that foster these abilities, including scaling laws, task complexity, pre‑training loss, quantization, and prompting strategies. It also discusses the extension to Large Reasoning Models and highlights safety concerns like deception, manipulation, and reward hacking, calling for improved evaluation and governance.

By Leonardo Berti, Flavio Giorgi, Gjergji Kasneci

llms agents reinforcement-learning robotics efficiency safety

arXiv AI

Jul 28

Coherent Without Grounding, Grounded Without Success: Observability and Epistemic Failure

arXiv:2603. 28371v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: When an agent can articulate why something works, we typically take this as evidence of genuine understanding.

By Camilo Chac\'on Sartori

llms agents

arXiv AI

4d ago

Recognizing Artificial Minds: A Philosophical Defense of AI Cognition

The paper defends the 'Whole Hog Thesis', arguing that sophisticated large language models such as ChatGPT are full linguistic and cognitive agents, possessing understanding, beliefs, desires, knowledge, and intentions. It rejects low‑level computational starting points and instead builds its case from high‑level behavioral observations, using Holistic Network Assumptions to link actions to mental states. The authors systematically rebut common objections—such as hallucinations and planning errors—by showing these resemble human fallibility and by challenging the necessity of traditional conditions like embodiment or semantic grounding.

By Herman Cappelen, Josh Dever

llms agents safety

arXiv AI

Jun 3

Agent Skills for Large Language Models: Architecture, Acquisition, Security, and the Path Forward

arXiv:2602. 12430v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The transition from monolithic language models to modular, skill-equipped agents marks a defining shift in how large language models (LLMs) are deployed in practice.

By Renjun Xu, Yang Yan

llms agents reinforcement-learning benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jun 12

Definitional alignment before capability alignment: a Design-Science framework for adjudicating claims about AGI

arXiv:2606. 12713v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Claims that artificial general intelligence has already arrived and claims that it remains decades away are often defended from overlapping evidence.

By J. E. Aguilera Briones

safety

One email a morning, machine-written

Related stories

A Practice Auditing Framework for Large Language Model Use: Collective Empiricism, Pseudo-Rational Cognition, and Governance of AI-Generated Content

Emergent Abilities in Large Language Models: A Survey

Coherent Without Grounding, Grounded Without Success: Observability and Epistemic Failure

Recognizing Artificial Minds: A Philosophical Defense of AI Cognition

Agent Skills for Large Language Models: Architecture, Acquisition, Security, and the Path Forward

Definitional alignment before capability alignment: a Design-Science framework for adjudicating claims about AGI