The paper investigates risk‑averse decision making where an agent chooses actions under uncertainty about the system state, using optimized certainty equivalent (OCE) metrics that encompass mean‑variance risk and CVaR. For known distributions, the optimal policy simplifies to a prediction‑set‑based solution for CVaR, linking it to conformal prediction sets. When distributions are unknown, the authors propose a data‑driven calibration method that employs a synthetic likelihood model and held‑out data to achieve high‑probability OCE risk control, and they demonstrate the method on two wireless beamforming scenarios.
By Amirmohammad Farzaneh, Osvaldo Simeone
arXiv:2608. 02528v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mixtures of low-rank adaptation experts increase parameter-efficient capacity by routing each input through a subset of adapters.
By Tom Saliencro, Rohan Desai, Priya Nair, Maya Lindqvist, Daniel Whitmore
arXiv:2607. 14407v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Many signal processing systems ultimately exist to {act}.
By Osvaldo Simeone
arXiv:2607. 15196v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present a novel viewpoint for uncertainty quantification.
By Raghad Alamri, Michele Caprio, Gavin Brown
arXiv:2510. 07750v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Robust optimization safeguards decisions against uncertainty by optimizing against worst-case scenarios, yet their effectiveness hinges on a prespecified robustness level that is often chosen ad hoc, leading to either insufficient protection or overly conservative and costly solutions.
By Wenbin Zhou, Shixiang Zhu
arXiv:2609. 10866v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) agents deployed in real-world environments are often vulnerable to adversarial perturbations in state observations, creating risks in safety-critical applications.
By Tong Li, Saunak Kumar Panda, Yisha Xiang