arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 3

OmniEdit-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Instruction-based Video Editing

OmniEdit-Bench introduces a comprehensive benchmark for instruction-based video editing (IVE), addressing limitations of existing datasets by covering spatial, temporal, audio, and reference-based editing tasks and distinguishing explicit from implicit instructions. The evaluation framework assesses editing quality across accuracy, preservation, realism, and consistency, using human judgments and vision-language models, and incorporates an accuracy-aware penalty to ensure instruction fidelity. Experiments reveal that current IVE models perform poorly, highlighting the need for improved methods.

By Chenxuan Miao, Yutong Feng, Yi Lu, Yunfeng Yan, Donglian Qi, Shiwei Zhang, Yu Liu, Xi Chen, Hengshuang Zhao
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 9

From Video Clips to Creation Trajectory: Sora100K for AI-Native Video Creation

The paper introduces Sora100K, a dataset that captures AI‑Native video creation workflows as structured trajectories rather than isolated clips. It categorizes trajectories into text‑to‑video generation roots, single‑turn editing edges, and multi‑turn editing sequences, annotating each with semantic and operation labels via a VLM. A rigorous construction pipeline ensures accurate source‑to‑edit lineage and intermediate states, and lightweight adaptation on LTX‑2 models demonstrates improved visual quality, multi‑shot generation, and cross‑shot consistency, though multi‑turn editing remains challenging.

By Sicong Yang, Ruihuan Yang, Jian Lu, Jianfei Yuan, Xiaodong Cun, Xiuli Bi
arXiv AI
Oct 31

WeVisCut: The Whole Editing Room in One Agent From Narration to Long-Form Video

WeVisCut is a long‑form script‑to‑video system that unifies narration, editing, and tool execution into a single agent. It uses a four‑stage data pipeline that reconstructs editing intent from finished videos, generating over 130K training examples to train a 9B policy capable of coordinating production and recovering from failures. The system introduces a 100‑task benchmark with five metrics, outperforming its base model, matching Claude Opus 5 in performance while using far fewer tokens, and surpassing task‑matched native editors on the proposed metrics.

By Chenyu Mu, Wenming Weng, Qinrui Wang, Xingsong Ye, Hao Yu, Jun He, Chong Sun, Chen Li, Jing Lyu, Erkun Yang, Cheng Deng