arXiv:2509. 21160v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: With the growing use of large language models, concerns over content authenticity have spurred a variety of watermarking schemes.
By Soham Bonnerjee, Subhrajyoty Roy, Sayar Karmakar
arXiv:2607. 00224v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Watermarking promises a statistical trace of large language model (LLM) use, but real documents, after editing or paraphrasing, rarely arrive as purely human-written or purely machine-generated.
By Shuwen Chai, Qiaosen Wang
arXiv:2606. 18430v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Statistical watermarks help organizations attribute large language model (LLM) outputs, yet existing detectors often struggle when watermark signals are weak, texts are repetitive, or watermarks are edited.
By Chih-Duo Hong, Yen-Pang Chen, Fang Yu
arXiv:2606. 04486v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Watermarking methods for language models have been studied extensively in the autoregressive setting, where tokens are generated sequentially.
By Daniel Zhao
arXiv:2607. 18445v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Regulatory regimes such as the EU AI Act mandate machine-readable marking of synthetic text, but existing watermark detectors rely on the generating LM and on heuristic thresholds with no closed-form calibration.
By Chengheng Li-Chen, Kyuhee Kim
arXiv:2606. 00613v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Watermarking should identify language-model output without degrading quality or limiting verification to the model provider.
By Shinwoo Park, Hyejin Park, Hyeseon An, Yo-Sub Han