arXiv Machine Learning July 2, 2026 By Shuwen Chai, Qiaosen Wang

Sample Complexities of Estimating Gumbel--Max Watermark Proportions with and without Reduction to Pivotal Statistics

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2607. 00224v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Watermarking promises a statistical trace of large language model (LLM) use, but real documents, after editing or paraphrasing, rarely arrive as purely human-written or purely machine-generated.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

llms

arXiv Machine Learning

1d ago

Optimal Watermark Localization in Mixed-Source Large Language Model Texts

arXiv:2608. 14906v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Watermarking provides a principled way to authenticate text generated by large language models (LLMs).

By Jose H. Blanchet, T. Tony Cai, Xiang Li, Hao Liu, Qi Long, Weijie J. Su

llms efficiency

arXiv Machine Learning

Jun 18

Signature filtering: a lightweight enhancement for statistical watermark detection in large language models

arXiv:2606. 18430v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Statistical watermarks help organizations attribute large language model (LLM) outputs, yet existing detectors often struggle when watermark signals are weak, texts are repetitive, or watermarks are edited.

By Chih-Duo Hong, Yen-Pang Chen, Fang Yu

llms rag benchmarks

arXiv Machine Learning

Jul 9

Fast segmentation of watermarked texts from large language models through an epidemic change-point framework

arXiv:2509. 21160v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: With the growing use of large language models, concerns over content authenticity have spurred a variety of watermarking schemes.

By Soham Bonnerjee, Subhrajyoty Roy, Sayar Karmakar

llms computer-vision benchmarks

arXiv Machine Learning

Jul 27

Efficient Online LLM Watermark Detection via Rao-Blackwellized E-Processes

arXiv:2607. 21958v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed, reliable and efficient mechanisms for distinguishing AI-generated text from human-written content have become essential.

By Lu Luo, Dandan Mo, Chengdong Xu, Ting Li, Jinhan Xie, Huiqiong Li, Niansheng Tang

llms

arXiv Machine Learning

Jul 8

Beyond Heuristic Tuning: Power-Calibrated LLM Watermarking

arXiv:2607. 05694v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Logit-based watermarking is a widely used mechanism for identifying LLM generated content, yet its effectiveness is governed by a fundamental trade-off between detectability and semantic distortion.

By Xiaopu Wang, Zelin He, Chengyuan Liu, Runze Li

llms

arXiv AI

Jun 2

Linguistics-Aware Non-Distortionary LLM Watermarking

arXiv:2606. 00613v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Watermarking should identify language-model output without degrading quality or limiting verification to the model provider.

By Shinwoo Park, Hyejin Park, Hyeseon An, Yo-Sub Han

llms computer-vision nlp

Related stories

Optimal Watermark Localization in Mixed-Source Large Language Model Texts

Signature filtering: a lightweight enhancement for statistical watermark detection in large language models

Fast segmentation of watermarked texts from large language models through an epidemic change-point framework

Efficient Online LLM Watermark Detection via Rao-Blackwellized E-Processes

Beyond Heuristic Tuning: Power-Calibrated LLM Watermarking

Linguistics-Aware Non-Distortionary LLM Watermarking