The Neuro‑Memory Fuzzy Inference System (NeMeFIS) is a hierarchical machine learning framework that models car‑following acceleration and deceleration by integrating five human memory types—procedural, working, episodic, semantic, and declarative—through metaheuristics and statistical validation. Trained on 54 models across arterial, collector, and rural highways, NeMeFIS outperforms traditional statistical and conventional machine learning approaches, revealing that declarative memory dominates braking decisions while procedural memory drives acceleration. The system’s robust performance on heterogeneous and homogeneous datasets supports its use in adaptive, human‑like decision systems for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles, potentially improving traffic safety.
arXiv:2603. 14841v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Road crashes remain a leading cause of preventable fatalities.
By Joyjit Roy, Samaresh Kumar Singh, Sushanta Das
arXiv:2605.21139v4 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Current end-to-end autonomous driving models are fundamentally constrained by the behavioral cloning ceiling of imitation learning. While rei...
By Yang Wu, Qiang Meng, Zhaojiang Liu, Youquan Liu, Jian Yang, Jin Xie
PRISM (Proactive Risk Intelligence and Safety Management) is an agentic multi-model architecture designed to shift autonomous transportation safety from reactive crash avoidance to proactive, continuous risk management. It uses inverse crash‑probability modeling to transform binary crash classifiers into dynamic safety scores, and runs three specialized models—trajectory kinematics, environmental risk, and VRU interaction—coordinated by a reinforcement‑learning reasoning layer. Across 1,296 naturalistic driving scenarios, PRISM achieved a mean safety score of 68/100, classified 77.6% of situations as advisory, and flagged 3.8% as near‑misses, with 11% requiring intervention or emergency response, highlighting trajectory risk and VRU proximity as key safety factors.
By Joyjit Roy, Samaresh Kumar Singh, Sushanta Das
The paper presents a lane‑change prediction model using knowledge‑graph embeddings and Bayesian inference to anticipate surrounding vehicles’ intentions 3–4 seconds before they occur. Three driving strategies—reactive, prediction‑based longitudinal, and prediction‑based lateral—are compared in CARLA simulations of risky merging scenarios. Prediction‑based approaches avoid collisions, reduce peak deceleration by up to 91 %, and are evaluated for ride comfort using ISO 2631‑1 vibration estimates.
By Mohamed Manzour, Aditya Kumar, Rub\'en Izquierdo, Miguel \'Angel Sotelo
CAR‑VLA is a Vision‑Language‑Action model for autonomous driving that jointly considers scene complexity and dynamic risk to determine reasoning depth, urgency, and focus. It maps four complexity‑risk categories to three reasoning modes—Fast Intuition, Slow Thinking, and Reflex Response—each tailored to different driving scenarios. The model is trained via progressive supervised learning and reinforcement learning, achieving competitive performance on NAVSIM and Navhard benchmarks and demonstrating risk‑aware reasoning in high‑risk scenarios.
By Xiaolei Chen, Zhuolin He, Yuxuan Liang, Xu Li, Haotian Chen, Fan Shi, Mengyang Zhao, Wenjuan Meng, Zisheng Chen, Zhihao Zhu, Zhounan Jin, Hengli Wang, Qingfan Wang, Jiamei Liang, Bin Li, Xiangyang Xue