Guide, Not Bind: Why Defeasible Priors Fail in Augmented Lagrangian Causal Discovery
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The paper investigates why differentiable causal discovery methods that encode expert priors as forbidden-edge constraints via an Augmented Lagrangian (ALM) penalty—termed the "guide, not bind" approach—often fail. It identifies two key failures: (1) the sequential penalty‑ramping ALM suppresses a true edge before counterfactual checks can detect it, and the proposed adaptive relaxation rule DADU violates necessary conditions for safe relaxation, leading to a high failure rate across thousands of training runs; (2) the standard correlation‑matching objective inherently ties a true edge and its reverse to the same cost, whereas covariance matching can separate them by a provable margin. The authors provide theoretical propositions, corollaries, and empirical evidence to support these claims.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.