This paper evaluates current gaze estimation methods in a human‑robot interaction setting using the NICO robotic platform. A new annotated dataset was collected, and four state‑of‑the‑art models were tested, showing angular errors comparable to general benchmarks. In the shared workspace, the best median error was 14.57 cm, highlighting practical limitations and prompting recommendations for integrating gaze estimation into HRI systems.
By Matej Palider, Omar Eldardeer, Viktor Kocur
arXiv:2610.07783v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Bird's-eye-view (BEV) representations have become a widely used interface between perception and planning in autonomous driving, but they encode what i...
By William Engel, Fabian Flohr
arXiv:2609.09610v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: This paper presents a marker-free eye-gaze estimation approach using a single 2D camera, such as an integrated laptop webcam. The gaze-related features...
By David Hurtubise-Martin, Feriel Fass, Djemel Ziou, Marie-Flavie Auclair-Fortier
arXiv:2607. 05473v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: According to commonly consented theories, the minimum hardware requirement for gaze tracker is one camera and two light sources to realize gaze estimation with free head movements.
By Tongbing Huang, Yang Fu, Yunfei Wang, Zhaocan Wang
According to commonly consented theories, the minimum hardware requirement for gaze tracker is one camera and two light sources to realize gaze estimation with free head movements. However, in some scenarios such as eye tracking on mobile devices, it is preferable to use less components, especially light sources.
arXiv:2502.10570v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Mobile gaze tracking on handheld devices commonly relies on \emph{appearance-based 2D gaze estimation} from the device's \emph{front-facing R...
By Yaxiong Lei, Yuheng Wang, Fergus Buchanan, Mingyue Zhao, Yusuke Sugano, Shijing He, Mohamed Khamis, Juan Ye