arXiv Computation and Language By Jinwen Luo, Han Jiang, Ziang Xiao, Susu Zhang

Diagnosing Model--Item Interactions in Language Model Benchmarks with LSIRM

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper introduces the latent space item response model (LSIRM) as a tool for uncovering how language models differ on specific benchmark items. By mapping 1,348 models across 5,761 BBH items and comparing scoring methods across BBH, GPQA, MMLU-Pro, and MuSR, the authors show that items with similar correct answers cluster together, especially when scored by option labels. LSIRM separates a model’s tendency to perform better on certain answer categories from other performance differences, revealing that small changes in scoring can dramatically alter model rankings.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 24

Using Human-LLM Disagreement to Improve Checklist-Based Quality Appraisal

arXiv:2608.20385v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Systematic reviews rely on quality appraisal of included studies, a process that is time-consuming and sensitive to ambiguity in checklist criteria. Al...

By Timo van der Kuil (Methodology and Statistics Utrecht University), Bruno Messina Coimbra (Methodology and Statistics Utrecht University), Mirjam van Zuiden (Clinical Psychology Utrecht University), Robert A. Bagheri (Methodology and Statistics Utrecht University), Rens van de Schoot (Methodology and Statistics Utrecht University), Klaas Dieleman (Methodology and Statistics Utrecht University), Berend Greijn (Methodology and Statistics Utrecht University), Stefan Houkes (Methodology and Statistics Utrecht University), Sebastiaan Rodenhuis (Methodology and Statistics Utrecht University), Elizabeth M. Grandfield (Methodology and Statistics Utrecht University)