Detecting and Guiding LLM-Generated Korean Poetry with Interpretable Form-level Features
Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
arXiv:2609.15511v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper investigates the generation and human evaluation of Japanese haiku by contemporary Large Language Models (LLMs), focusing on authorship pe...
arXiv:2606. 24093v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We ask whether the geographic origin of Tang-dynasty poets leaves a detectable linguistic trace in their work.
Recently, large language models (LLMs) have achieved promising progress in the fields of classical Chinese translation and the generation of classical poetry. However, domain-specific research on precise translation and affective-semantic understanding of classical poetry remains limited.
arXiv:2606. 12392v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recently, large language models (LLMs) have achieved promising progress in the fields of classical Chinese translation and the generation of classical poetry.
arXiv:2609.23951v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Expressive speech synthesis has advanced through prosody modeling, yet generating structured poetic speech, such as haiku, remains challenging. Prior w...
The study demonstrates that text produced by large language models (LLMs) leaves a distinct stylometric footprint—primarily increased entropy and lexical diversity—across multiple models and domains. In contrast, AI editing of human text does not replicate this footprint; edited texts show only modest lexical diversity gains and reduced entropy, with lexical density emerging as the key distinguishing feature. Consequently, stylometric analysis can differentiate AI-generated from AI-edited content, but is less effective at distinguishing either from purely human writing.