arXiv AI
Authorship attribution and aesthetic evaluation of AI poetry: a case study with Haiku
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Oct 31
Beauty Is Human: When People Love AI-Generated Art, They Think a Human Made It
The study shows that when people enjoy an artwork, they are more likely to believe it was created by a human, regardless of whether it was actually AI-generated or not. In a large online Turing Test, 22.1 percentage points more of respondents who favored a picture thought it was human-made, and this pattern held across all images and detection methods. Even those who were skeptical of AI art often preferred AI-generated pieces but still attributed them to humans, indicating a strong link between aesthetic preference and perceived authorship.
arXiv AI
Sep 10
The human-authorship halo: attribution bias in literary style evaluation by humans and AI
arXiv:2510.08831v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As AI writing tools become widespread, we need to understand how both humans and machines evaluate literary style, a domain where objective standar...
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1
Detecting and Guiding LLM-Generated Korean Poetry with Interpretable Form-level Features
arXiv:2608.28986v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLMs often struggle with modern Korean poetry, producing outputs that resemble "line-broken prose." We address two coupled tasks: detecting whether a K...
arXiv AI
Aug 13
TangPoetryBench: A Multi-Dimensional Benchmark and Rubric-Conditioned Evaluator for Poetry-to-Image Generation
arXiv:2608. 11452v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Text-to-image (T2I) models are increasingly asked to illustrate literary and cultural content, yet we cannot measure how well an image renders the meaning of a poem.
arXiv AI
Sep 24
Beyond Poetry: Can Large Language Models Generate Classical Arabic Maqamat?
arXiv:2609. 28245v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong performance in creative text generation, yet their ability to produce culturally grounded and stylistically constrained literary forms remains underexplored.
arXiv AI
Aug 26
The Limits of Automatic Evaluation of Creativity in Large Language Models
The paper examines whether existing automatic methods can reliably assess creativity in text produced by large language models (LLMs). By collecting human ratings on 11 creativity dimensions for both human and AI short stories, the authors compare these judgments with automated metrics and LLM-as-a-Judge evaluations. The results show a significant misalignment: automated metrics and LLM judges favor AI-generated stories and show near-zero correlation with human assessments, revealing fundamental limitations in current computational approaches to evaluating creative text.