The study investigates whether cross‑lingual clinical annotation projection can be treated as a constrained text‑generation task that preserves the original text while inserting entity tags. Using a workflow that embeds tags directly into immutable target‑language text and then validates them deterministically, the authors evaluated this approach against supervised candidate‑span projection and hybrid ML‑LLM refinement across six languages. Results show that direct LLM projection, particularly with GLM 5.2 and Gemma4:31B, achieves the highest strict F1 scores (up to 0.9201) and outperforms previous methods by 0.0564–0.1512, producing over 55,000 grounded mentions with accurate offsets.
By \'Alvaro Rey-Blanes, Francisco J. Moreno-Barea, Francisco J. Veredas
arXiv:2608.29890v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Biomedical Named Entity Recognition (NER) is fundamental to healthcare AI applications, including clinical decision support and medical information ext...
By Nhu Vo, Phuong Nguyen, Nu Uyen Phuong Le, Inigo Jauregi Unanue, Dung D. Le, Massimo Piccardi, Wray Buntine
This thesis explores how to select and adapt NLP models for global health literature when annotated data and computational resources are scarce. It compares skip‑gram word2vec models trained on increasingly large specialized corpora with BioWordVec for semantic tag discovery, finding that larger coverage does not always yield more useful domain associations. The study also evaluates convolutional spaCy models versus a RoBERTa transformer for named entity recognition, noting a trade‑off between higher F1 scores and longer inference time, and investigates MiniLM few‑shot versus BART‑MNLI zero‑shot classification for multi‑label topic classification, highlighting practical constraints of inference cost.
"whyItMatters":"The work provides empirical guidance on balancing model accuracy and resource demands for building knowledge systems in low‑resource global health settings."
By Genis Skura, Antoine Geissb\"uhler, Jean-Luc Falcone
arXiv:2608. 16643v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automated detection of errors in clinical documentation is a promising application of large language models (LLMs), yet decisions to deploy such models rest on benchmarks that evaluate each clinical note in isolation.
By Yifan Zhang, Rahmatollah Beheshti
arXiv:2609.12544v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Clinical de-identification relies on accurately identifying personally identifiable information (PII). However, manually annotated datasets are costly...
By Linh Uyen Le, Christian Hoang, Huy Hoang Ha
arXiv:2606. 07853v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models are transforming the support for clinical decision and their application in real scenarios.
By Giordano de Pinho Souza, Glaucia Melo, Josefino Cabral Melo Lima, Daniel Schneider