arXiv AI By Shashwat Pandey, Satwik Pandey, Suresh Raghu

Confidently Wrong, Silently So: Auditing Undetectable Failures of a Deployed On-Device Language Model

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper audits a developer‑accessible on‑device language model, revealing that it can confidently produce incorrect answers while refusing benign prompts, a phenomenon termed task‑asymmetric miscalibration. The model’s confident outputs are surface‑indistinguishable, with classifiers based on user‑visible features failing to separate correct from wrong responses. The authors propose a model‑agnostic audit protocol, a surface‑indistinguishability test, and a black‑box consistency wrapper that improves reliability without requiring model access.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 25

From Subjective Judgments to Auditable Standards:Protocol-Guided AI Auditing of Website Redundancy

The paper introduces CORA (Counterfactual, Observable Redundancy Audit), a protocol for auditing website redundancy by measuring repetition load, normal-use tax, and failure-domain recovery reserve. Each audit run records screenshots, stable element identities, and task traces, while a versioned vision‑language model generates annotations that are validated and released only if they meet calibrated criteria. Experiments on a transparent mechanistic testbed show that CORA’s factorized representation separates reserve from normal-use tax and predicts perturbed success more accurately than scalar-load baselines, but it withholds automated scores when instruments fail to meet release requirements, indicating that CORA is an auditable candidate procedure for the studied benchmark rather than a universal standard.

By Ge Kong, Yongtong Cao