arXiv:2608. 02786v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI systems can fail silently.
By Priyanka Bajaj (Independent Researcher)
arXiv:2606. 01365v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tool-using multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems spend computation through model tokens, tool calls, retries, and code execution before producing an answer.
By Xianyou Li, Weiran Yan, Yichao Wu, Penghao Liang, Mengwei Yuan, Jianan Liu, Jing Yang
The paper audits a developer‑accessible on‑device language model, revealing that it can confidently produce incorrect answers while refusing benign prompts, a phenomenon termed task‑asymmetric miscalibration. The model’s confident outputs are surface‑indistinguishable, with classifiers based on user‑visible features failing to separate correct from wrong responses. The authors propose a model‑agnostic audit protocol, a surface‑indistinguishability test, and a black‑box consistency wrapper that improves reliability without requiring model access.
By Shashwat Pandey, Satwik Pandey, Suresh Raghu
PinSieve is a production system that selectively serves vision‑language models (VLMs) for enterprise content‑quality triage, operating only on the grey‑zone cases that lightweight models cannot resolve. The deployed VLM Serving Agent filters 2.05× more non‑actionable items, improves review productivity by 25.7%, cuts operating costs by 16.2%, and delivers signals the same day instead of the next. A governed memory flywheel with selective feedback, audit sampling, and a bounded proposal‑verifier loop further reduces false‑negative rates from 17.73% to 13.29% over six months, while a reasoning review agent audits teacher‑generated rationales for keep/repair/drop decisions.
whyItMatters":"The system demonstrates how selective VLM serving and governed feedback loops can substantially improve efficiency, cost, and accuracy in enterprise AI content‑quality pipelines."
By Chuqing Gao, Yuanfang Song, Jonathan Zhang, Yifan Wu, Vishwakarma Singh, Qinglong Zeng, Andrey Gusev
arXiv:2608.29128v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Tool-using agents are commonly evaluated by a single bit: whether an end-to-end workflow completed. This metric fails to distinguish failures that matt...
By Zelin Wan, Arash Nourian, Xiaoxiao Li, Nihar Nandan, Kamalakannan Nandagopal
arXiv:2607. 20436v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Safety evaluations often assume that behavior observed during testing reflects behavior in ordinary use, but fine-tuning can break this assumption.
By Phongsakon Mark Konrad, Toygar Tanyel, Serkan Ayvaz