The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at Hugging Face Trending Papers.
The paper introduces an agent architecture that uses tools and memory to selectively correct wrist photoplethysmography (PPG) heart‑rate estimates. By generating candidate corrections from pulse, motion, and historical data, and evaluating their predicted benefits and harms, the system decides whether to retain, correct, or reject each estimate. Across four public datasets, the approach reduced mean absolute error by up to 44.5% and demonstrated real‑time deployment on a wearable‑smartphone platform.
arXiv:2412.17540v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reflective photoplethysmography (PPG) has become the default sensing technique in wearable devices to monitor cardiac activity via a person's heart...
arXiv:2605.10871v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present Attractor-Vascular Coupling Theory (AVCT), a theory-guided framework for deriving interpretable blood pressure (BP) predictors fro...
PPG-Bench is an open‑source benchmark that evaluates five publicly available photoplethysmography (PPG) foundation models across nine datasets and 26 tasks, covering cardiovascular state estimation, activity, sleep, screening, and identification. The benchmark tests models under four downstream regimes—linear probing, random forests, frozen MLP probes, and end‑to‑end finetuning—while also comparing them to three controls: a random/constant baseline, a deterministic pulse‑rate‑variability feature set, and a generic time‑series foundation model (MOMENT). Results show that over a third of task‑regime combinations yield no advantage for any PPG foundation model over the baseline, and in most cases no PPG‑specific model outperforms the simple controls, indicating that current PPG foundation models lack generalised, transferable representations.
The study evaluates how acquisition context and photoplethysmography (PPG) signals contribute to session‑calibrated blood pressure tracking using a wearable‑state model on 653 AuroraBP participants. Adding contextual information reduced mean absolute errors (MAEs) for systolic and diastolic BP by 0.436 mmHg and 0.126 mmHg, respectively, while PPG alone provided modest improvements. Exploratory follow‑ups with sensor‑history ensembles and pulse‑rate fusion yielded only slight gains, and a separate intraoperative model (VitalDB) showed limited PPG benefit.
arXiv:2607. 27076v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Continuous cuffless blood pressure (BP) monitoring remains challenging due to motion artifacts, physiological variability, and the limited robustness of conventional pulse transit time (PTT) models under dynamic conditions.