arXiv:2608. 16556v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Across a Physical AI stack, evaluation maturity is inversely aligned with deployment risk: foundation models enjoy mature, standardized harnesses, while the embodied layers on which deployment actually turns remain fragmented across benchmark-specific simulators, embodiments, and interfaces.
By Siyi Li, Yuchen Kang, Wuliang Wang, Zhengjie Zhang, Jiangpin Liu, Jianhao Yao, Jie Chen
arXiv:2608. 08239v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM routers promise efficiency by matching each request to the cheapest adequate model, and are increasingly applied per step inside multi-step agents.
By Ashritha Gonuguntla
arXiv:2604. 16870v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: AI agents increasingly call external tools (file system, network, APIs) through the Model Context Protocol (MCP).
By Daeyeon Son
arXiv:2605.18727v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Evaluating embodied systems with real dexterous hardware requires more than isolated motor-skill tests: an agent must perceive a changing sce...
By Feng Chen, Tianzhe Chu, Li Sun, Pei Zhou, Zhuxiu Xu, Shenghua Gao, Yuexiang Zhai, Yanchao Yang, Yi Ma
arXiv:2603.01209v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: In CodeAct, language-model agents write Python that calls tools and use execution feedback to choose actions. Persistent runtimes preserve Python v...
By Victor May, Van Khue Nguyen, Aaditya Salgarkar, Yishan Wang, Diganta Misra, Huu Nguyen
arXiv:2606. 00515v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Contact-rich manipulation demands both high-level semantic reasoning and the safe regulation of high-frequency contact dynamics.
By Haofan Cao, Zhaoyang Li, Zhichao You, Liang Guo, Tianrui Li
arXiv:2606. 13886v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models excel at mapping visual inputs and natural language instructions directly to robotic control policies.
By Namai Chandra, Shriram Damodaran, Lin Wang
Hi-FLoop introduces a hierarchical state‑feedback framework for multi‑agent traffic simulation that reconciles decision time scales over an 8‑second rollout. The model uses eight scene‑level Worlds to maintain joint hypotheses, with an 8‑second Goal, 2‑second Preview, and 1‑second Control hierarchy, and commits only executed prefixes every 0.5 seconds to preserve factual consistency. A joint preview interaction graph and a prefix‑frozen A‑to‑B cascade enable sparse interaction refinement and accurate state recovery, achieving an overall score of 0.689987 on the H‑D public‑validation split and strong oracle‑minADE performance.
whyItMatters":"The paper presents a novel multi‑timescale approach that improves consistency and realism in long‑horizon traffic simulations, as evidenced by its competitive evaluation metrics."
arXiv:2607. 07405v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tool-using LLM agents can violate the very policies they are deployed to enforce while appearing to complete the task successfully.
By Vikas Reddy, Sumanth Reddy Challaram, Abhishek Basu
The paper investigates how tool‑using language‑model agents can safely commit changes to infrastructure when external state may change between read and commit. By distinguishing invalidating races from predicate‑preserving and irrelevant ones, the authors evaluate three commit‑time guard granularities—global epoch, read‑set version, and semantic commit predicate—using a deterministic simulator and three quantized model families. The study finds that only the complete predicate guard consistently eliminates unsafe commits, while freshness‑based guards block a large proportion of benign races and model‑side signals fail to replace precise semantic enforcement.
By Zihao Zheng, Jiayu Long, Baichuan Li, Junyi Yao
arXiv:2605. 27898v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As LLMs are increasingly deployed as agents, reliable assessment of their agentic capabilities has become essential.
By Pengyu Zhu, Lijun Li, Yaxing Lyu, Qianxin Luo, Jingyi Yang, Yi Liu, Tingfeng Hui, Xinyu Yuan, Li Sun, Sen Su, Jing Shao
Mingbird is a local‑first agent harness designed for small open‑weight language models (2–9 B) that run on ordinary laptops. It introduces ten mechanisms—such as a byte‑level net‑zero prefill budget, a finish gate that re‑reads the task before accepting completion, and signature‑level loop detection—to address common failure modes that arise from the harness rather than the model itself. In controlled experiments on the LRAB benchmark and the $ au^2$‑bench, Mingbird achieves higher overall scores (0.886 and 0.856 respectively) compared to other harnesses, and its ablation studies show that each mechanism contributes measurable performance gains.
By Hao Wang, Ting Huang