arXiv:2607. 19232v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning (HRL) intends to separate strategic planning from primitive execution.
By Kshitij Kumar Srivastava, Kshitij Jerath
arXiv:2607. 23726v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Exploration in sparse-reward long-horizon tasks poses significant challenges for reinforcement learning.
By Zahra Abdalla Elashaal, Afef Hfaiedh, Nahla Khraief, Issmail Ellabib, Giansalvo Cirrincione
arXiv:2507. 23604v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Decentralized Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) methods allow for learning scalable multi-agent policies, but suffer from partial observability and induced non-stationarity.
By Tommaso Marzi, Cesare Alippi, Andrea Cini
arXiv:2107. 08183v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: High-dimensional state and action spaces combined with sparse reward structures in reinforcement learning (RL) environments typically require advanced control architectures.
By JaeYoon Kim, Junyu Xuan, Christy Liang, Farookh Hussain
In value-based reinforcement learning, improving the accuracy of policy evaluation has been shown to improve downstream policy optimization performance. The widely adopted family of approximations rel...
arXiv:2606. 16729v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While there is an extensive body of work characterizing the sample complexity of discounted cumulative-reward MDPs, finite sample analyses for average-reward MDPs have been limited, and most existing works rely on restrictive assumptions such as ergodicity or access to a generative model.
By Jongmin Lee, Ernest K. Ryu, Vaneet Aggarwal
Limiting‑Kernel Q(λ) (LKQL) is an off‑policy value estimator that blends n‑step truncation with a long‑horizon approximation based on the limiting kernel. It maintains the computational efficiency of n‑step methods while improving policy evaluation accuracy, especially for long‑horizon tasks. The authors prove faster convergence of LKQL’s operator under aperiodicity and near‑on‑policy conditions, and demonstrate empirical gains on MuJoCo continuous‑control benchmarks.
By Tolga Ok, Arman Sharifi Kolarijani, Peyman Mohajerin Esfahani, Mohamad Amin Sharifi Kolarijani
arXiv:2607. 17201v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In this work we study the Best Policy Identification (BPI) problem in online, tabular Reinforcement Learning.
By Joseph Lazzaro, Alessio Russo, Aldo Pacchiano
arXiv:2606. 09825v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Training reinforcement learning (RL) policies from scratch is costly: it requires careful reward and environment design, extensive tuning, and substantial computation.
By Anton Bolychev, Georgiy Malaniya, Sinan Ibrahim, Pavel Osinenko
arXiv:2607. 20834v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Offline goal-conditioned reinforcement learning (RL) holds the promise of learning general-purpose policies from static datasets.
By Ahad Jawaid
arXiv:2606. 17377v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study performance-driven environment abstraction for decision-making in large Markov decision processes.
By Yue Guan, Dipankar Maity, Panagiotis Tsiotras
arXiv:2603. 23461v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We study reinforcement learning (RL) with linear function approximation in Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) satisfying \emph{linear Bellman completeness} -- a fundamental setting where the Bellman backup of any linear value function remains linear.
By Zakaria Mhammedi, Alexander Rakhlin, Nneka Okolo