arXiv:2609.23845v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Decentralised federated learning removes the aggregation server but makes collaboration dependent on transient peer availability. In mobile and intermi...
arXiv:2607. 03171v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Decentralised federated learning, based on peer-to-peer communication, is increasingly proposed for on-device training of machine learning models, promising a privacy-preserving, communication-efficient training process with no risk of single-point failure.
arXiv:2607. 08651v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Decentralized federated learning (DFL) removes the central server by letting nodes exchange model updates through peer-to-peer gossip, but existing gossip-based methods often lack provenance finality and resilience to Byzantine or lazy participants.
arXiv:2608. 06946v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In gossip learning, a network of nodes trains a shared model collaboratively, without a central coordinator, by repeatedly exchanging parts of their local models.
arXiv:2405. 07708v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Decentralized learning (DL) enables participants to collaboratively train models without a central server, yet it faces significant scalability challenges that demand sparsification to reduce the prohibitive communication costs of peer-to-peer exchange.
arXiv:2504. 17471v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Gossip Learning (GL) is a decentralized learning paradigm where users iteratively exchange and aggregate models with a small set of neighboring peers.
The paper investigates how the strategic placement of Byzantine nodes in decentralized federated learning (DFL) affects the propagation of malicious influence across the communication graph. It introduces Byzantine Placement Influence (BPI), a measure that captures cumulative exposure of honest nodes to Byzantine sources over time, and develops algorithms to optimize BPI across various network structures and attack types. Experiments demonstrate that BPI-guided placements consistently yield highly damaging configurations, highlighting the importance of considering node placement in DFL threat models.
arXiv:2606. 10774v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Decentralized Federated Learning(DFL) enables collaborative model training across wireless edge nodes, including IoT deployments, autonomous vehicles, UAV swarms, and satellite constellations.
The paper investigates the trade‑off between the costs of participating in federated learning (privacy, communication, compute) and the potential gains in model performance, framing this as a game‑theoretic problem of individual rationality versus autarky. It shows that clients can remain below their local‑training baseline for many rounds and that simply capping per‑round contributions harms learning. The authors propose a new mechanism that provides short‑term participation guarantees and personalized model evaluation, demonstrating theoretically and empirically that clients can avoid short‑term losses without significantly harming overall performance, even under moderate heterogeneity.
CALM introduces a smooth trust gating mechanism for decentralized federated learning, replacing hard filtering of teacher models with class‑wise, sample‑wise, and label‑based weighting. It allows clients with heterogeneous architectures to distill knowledge from peers without a central server or shared data, even under severe non‑IID label skew. Experiments on CIFAR‑10, SVHN, OrganAMNIST, and Google Speech Commands show that CALM consistently outperforms uniform and hard‑filtered distillation and matches or exceeds other heterogeneous‑FL methods.
arXiv:2606. 18384v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hierarchical Federated Learning (HFL) enables scalable collaborative model training across distributed devices while preserving data privacy.
arXiv:2606. 30383v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A rapidly growing class of LLM agents is multi-party: the agent acts for a principal (who briefs it, sends follow-ups, and receives results) while also conversing in a separate channel with a counterparty whose interests may diverge (negotiating with a vendor, screening inbound requests, or mediating between employees).