arXiv Computer Vision

DisasterRoute: Evidence-Guided Dual-System Routing for Visual Disaster Question Answering

DisasterRoute introduces a dual-system routing framework for visual disaster question answering that balances fast direct decisions with selective step-by-step reasoning. The system first uses Disaster-S1, a vision‑language model trained for option discrimination, to produce a quick answer. If the model’s confidence is low or evidence suggests uncertainty, the framework routes the query to DisasterVL, a more comprehensive reasoning model, thereby improving accuracy while maintaining low latency.

arXiv AI
Jun 6

DisasterBench: A Multimodal Benchmark for UAV-Based Disaster Response in Complex Environments

arXiv:2606. 06217v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: When a disaster unfolds, responders must answer not only what is happening, but also why it is happening, what will happen next, and what to do now, often from noisy low-altitude UAV views and under tight on-site compute constraints.

By Tan Zhang, Quanyou Li, Lu Zhang, Jun Liu, Xiaofeng Zhu, Ping Hu
arXiv Computer Vision
5d ago

LADBench: A Benchmark for Logical Fault Detection in Images

LADBench is a new benchmark comprising over 1,000 synthetic images that contain logical anomalies across four domains—Residential, Urban, Collaborative, and Nature. It introduces a Tiered Prompting Protocol that progressively discloses information to test how much explicit help a model needs to locate and reason about these faults. Evaluation of leading foundation models shows that even the best only reaches 70.11% accuracy, indicating that implicit logical fault detection remains largely unsolved.

By Sahasra Kondapalli, Lara Radovanovic, Aadi Palnitkar, Mingyang Mao, Xiaomin Lin
arXiv AI
Sep 2

Towards reliable multimodal disaster severity assessment through preference optimization and explainable vision-language reasoning

The paper introduces a two‑stage training framework that combines Supervised Fine‑Tuning (SFT) and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to improve multimodal disaster severity assessment. It creates two datasets—ReasoningSet for validated rationales and PreferenceSet for paired rationales—using a single Human‑in‑the‑Loop workflow. Experiments on InternVL‑3‑8B and LLaVA‑1.5‑7B show that SFT boosts classification accuracy and Macro‑F1, while DPO further enhances interpretability and alignment with human judgment.

By Yuanjun Zhang, Fuzel Ahamed Shaik, Suvojit Acharjee, Fahad Khalid, Mourad Oussalah
arXiv AI
Jun 3

VistaHop: Benchmarking Multi-hop Visual Reasoning for Visual DeepSearch

arXiv:2606. 03273v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Visual DeepSearch requires multimodal large reasoning model (MLRM) agents to answer complex visual queries by repeatedly inspecting image regions, grounding intermediate reasoning in visual evidence, and connecting fine-grained clues across long reasoning chains.

By Hang He, Chuhuai Yue, Chengqi Dong, Chengcheng Wan, Ting Su, Haiying Sun, Jiajun Chai, Xiaohan Wang, Guojun Yin
arXiv AI
Oct 16

CoWorld Reasoner: Agentic Multimodal Reasoning with the Evolving Video World Model-Driven Harness

CoWorld Reasoner is an agentic framework that leverages a Video World Model (VWM) as a unified visual reasoning engine for Vision‑Language Models (VLMs). It exposes multiple visual operations through tools and skills, allowing the VLM to decide when to imagine, select an operation, generate visual content, and interpret the resulting evidence. The framework includes a VLM‑VWM Harness Co‑Evolution mechanism that jointly refines tools, skills, and execution code based on feedback, while keeping model weights fixed. Across seven benchmarks covering spatial, temporal, causal, and perceptual reasoning, CoWorld Reasoner outperforms direct VLM reasoning and improves accuracy on all benchmarks, achieving notable gains on MMSI and ERQA.

By Dongjie Cheng, Ruifeng Yuan, Ran Wei, Ning Song, Yongqi Li, Wenjie Li
arXiv AI
Jun 10

V-REX: Benchmarking Exploratory Visual Reasoning via Chain-of-Questions

arXiv:2512. 11995v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: While many vision-language models (VLMs) are developed to answer well-defined, straightforward questions with highly specified targets, as in most benchmarks, they often struggle in practice with complex open-ended tasks, which usually require multiple rounds of exploration and reasoning in the visual space.

By Chenrui Fan, Yijun Liang, Shweta Bhardwaj, Kwesi Cobbina, Ming Li, Tianyi Zhou
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 16

AdaLoop: Thinking with the Vision Encoder

AdaLoop introduces a question‑conditioned visual recurrence framework for vision‑language models, allowing the vision encoder to adapt its computation to each question while keeping pretrained weights frozen. The method reuses encoder transformations across multiple iterations, improving performance over standard fine‑tuning and single‑pass baselines. Experiments on the VisRO dataset demonstrate gains across three VLM families on both in‑distribution and out‑of‑distribution examples.

By Xinran Nicole Han, Yiyang Lu, Katelyn Gan, Todd Zickler