arXiv:2606. 12871v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Search Agents (SAs) typically leverage large language models (LLMs) to support complex information-seeking tasks by autonomously exploring web sources and synthesizing information into comprehensive responses.
arXiv:2609.14412v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep research agents answer complex questions through iterative loops of searching, reading, and reasoning. Recent work on reasoning-intensive benchmar...
SearchHorizonBench is a new benchmark that evaluates how AI agents decide whether the cost of an additional search is justified by its expected benefit. It provides 45,632 executions on 3,168 questions, using paired continuations and repeated runs to separate true search gain from generation noise. The dataset shows that historical calibration can reduce Brier error by 16.2% and that free‑selection observations offer a 2.49‑point utility advantage over a constant action, highlighting the importance of accurate search‑value estimation.
arXiv:2610.08452v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a widely used approach for grounding large language models (LLMs) in external knowledge. However, configuring...
The paper introduces RuVerBench, a benchmark with 2,458 instances for evaluating the reliability of Large Language Models acting as judges (LaaJ) in verifying rubric compliance within agentic scenarios such as deep research and agentic coding. It systematically meta‑evaluates frontier LLMs, revealing that even the most advanced models perform well yet still produce substantial noise. The study also examines how prompt design, batching, and majority voting affect verification accuracy, noting that weaker models are more prompt‑sensitive, batched verification trades accuracy for efficiency, and majority voting offers diminishing returns.
arXiv:2604.18235v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Search agents achieve strong question-answering performance through multi-turn interactions with search engines, with Group Relative Policy O...
EvalResearchBench (ERB) is a benchmark that tests whether AI agents can autonomously design evaluation tasks for recursive self‑improvement. In ERB, a researcher agent selects or synthesizes tasks, builds graders, and refines them through pilot tests before producing a final evaluator that runs within fixed time and API budgets. Experiments with nine researchers and thirteen candidate models show that the best automated evaluators achieve about 75% concordance with target benchmarks, below the 91% ceiling set by target disagreements, and that human‑designed task samples still outperform many automated approaches.
arXiv:2608. 05643v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Test-time scaling improves LLM reasoning by using additional inference compute, but wider sampling alone can suffer from diminishing returns: new rollouts often repeat existing answer patterns instead of adding useful reasoning diversity.
T-Search is an open-weight agentic retriever designed for hard multi-step search tasks. It performs bounded multi-round searches over a fixed corpus, returning ranked evidence chunks with brief justifications, while allowing the answer generation component to be swapped without retraining. Trained on synthetic search tasks and evaluated on seven English and Russian benchmarks, it achieves 56.0 Recall@10 with one rollout and 61.3 with three fused rollouts, surpassing larger open models.
SearchAtlas is a framework that transforms raw search trajectories of large language model (LLM) agents into structured evidential query graphs, where edges capture how evidence is propagated from queries to the final answer. The automated parsing pipeline achieves a mean edge F1 of 86.0% against human-annotated graphs and remains consistent across repeated runs. Using SearchAtlas, the authors analyze five search agents on three benchmarks, uncovering systematic differences in search scale and evidence aggregation, and revealing process failures such as fragmented answer support, unmet question constraints, and unverified parametric knowledge that correlate strongly with incorrect answers.
arXiv:2608. 05212v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep search agents tackle challenging questions through long-horizon web interactions, a process that is both complex and fragile: small reasoning errors may propagate through long, noisy trajectories into fluent but incorrect answers.
arXiv:2608. 11232v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Evaluating LLM coding agents in algorithmic trading is difficult because static benchmarks risk data contamination and numerical backtest outputs require ground truth from actual code execution.