arXiv:2602.01331v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Contemporary large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems exhibit systematic advantages in deep research tasks, which emphasize itera...
arXiv:2610.15208v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deep research requires connecting multiple steps of search, reasoning, and computation, with intermediate findings guiding what to investigate next....
The paper introduces Librarian Agents, a framework that trains large language models to proactively curate long-context workspaces by reorganizing raw documents into a hierarchical filesystem of synthetic files and reference links. This builder agent, optimized via reinforcement learning, aims to maximize downstream answering accuracy by anticipating future queries rather than reacting to them. Experiments show that Librarian Agents outperform leading retrieval and precomputation methods, achieving a 33‑point accuracy gain on BrowseComp‑Plus and a 31‑point improvement on BRIGHT in zero‑shot settings.
arXiv:2607. 10463v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) extends static RAG by allowing language models to iteratively reason, generate search queries, retrieve evidence, and predict answers.
arXiv:2607. 24850v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled search agents to autonomously tackle complex tasks across extended search and reasoning horizons.
arXiv:2607. 28229v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The web is increasingly accessed by AI agents rather than humans.
Agentic retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) extends static RAG by allowing language models to iteratively reason, generate search queries, retrieve evidence, and predict answers. However, it remains challenging for models to decide when to retrieve, whether to use lexical matching or semantic similarity, and how to control context granularity to prevent irrelevant tokens from interfering with agent reasoning.
The paper introduces SEEDS, a preview-guided evidence admission framework that allows search agents to selectively admit retrieved documents into their reasoning process. SEEDS exposes lightweight previews of candidates and lets the agent decide which and how many to fully inspect based on its current reasoning state, enabling arbitrary subset selection rather than fixed or rank-based policies. Experiments on nine knowledge-intensive QA benchmarks show that SEEDS improves search effectiveness and reduces full-evidence consumption compared to traditional retrieval prefixes.
arXiv:2606. 05241v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Public benchmarks enable fair and reproducible evaluation of LLM reasoning, but they become fragile for deep research agents that actively search the web during inference.
arXiv:2607. 21461v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep research requires agents to find answers that jointly satisfy multiple constraints.
arXiv:2607. 08662v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-based web search agents are transforming information seeking from simple factoid question answering into complex, deep-and-wide search and research-oriented tasks.
arXiv:2606. 10460v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent large language models (LLMs) have shown rapid progress in reading-based question answering (QA), where evidence is explicitly provided or can be trivially retrieved.