The paper compares four audit methods for assessing identity‑level differential privacy in pre‑trained, black‑box face generators. Each method—GaussMech, KDE‑LR, MMD‑TV, and ROC‑HT—has distinct assumptions, hyperparameters, and finite‑sample limitations, and they produce markedly different epsilon estimates when applied to FaceFusion and InstantID. The study finds that all methods reveal significant identity distinguishability, but none can be reliably ranked in this high‑distinguishability regime, suggesting that future work should evaluate them on partially private mechanisms.
By Arman Zareian Jahromi, Vishnu Bondalakunta, Mohammad Akbar Bin Shah, Naimul Haque, Shuangqing Wei, George T. Amariucai
arXiv:2503. 10945v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Current practices for reporting differential privacy (DP) guarantees for machine learning (ML) algorithms such as DP-SGD provide an incomplete and potentially misleading picture.
By Juan Felipe Gomez, Bogdan Kulynych, Georgios Kaissis, Flavio P. Calmon, Jamie Hayes, Borja Balle, Antti Honkela
arXiv:2303. 07152v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Achieving optimal statistical performance while ensuring the privacy of personal data is a challenging yet crucial objective in modern data analysis.
By T. Tony Cai, Yichen Wang, Linjun Zhang
arXiv:2606. 26373v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Dense embeddings power semantic search and retrieval-augmented generation, but embedding-inversion attacks can reconstruct source text from a vector: when a vector database leaks, the documents behind it leak too.
By Sergey Kurilenko
arXiv:2608.28934v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Differential privacy (DP) has traditionally been used to provide theoretical upper bounds on an algorithm's stability to changing its training data. In...
By Saloni Modi, Srivi Balaji, Yusong Zhu, Gautam Kamath, Kevin Tian
Geometric Data Perturbation (GDP) allows participants to share distance‑preserving transformations of their private data for one‑shot collaborative learning. The paper examines the vulnerability when an analyst colludes with participants, showing that shared‑anchor alignment can restore compatibility but also enables exact data recovery. To mitigate this, the authors propose adding noise to the anchor representations rather than the private data, demonstrating through experiments on MNIST and CelebA that this approach yields better privacy‑utility trade‑offs under collusion.
By Keiyu Nosaka, Yamato Suetake, Yuichi Takano, Yukihiko Okada, Akiko Yoshise
arXiv:2603. 10937v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The use of synthetic data has become increasingly popular as a privacy-preserving alternative to sharing real datasets, especially in sensitive domains such as healthcare, finance, and demography.
By Rajdeep Pathak, Amit Basak, Sayantee Jana
The paper introduces Private Best-of-N (PrivBoN), a method that adds calibrated Gumbel noise to reward scores during inference-time alignment, achieving both ε-differential privacy and KL-regularized alignment. When the privacy budget exceeds a critical threshold ε*, the noise becomes regret-optimal, matching the theoretical alignment skyline. The authors also propose Private Inference-Time Pessimism (PrivITP), which uses χ^2-regularized rejection sampling and a two-phase Gaussian mechanism to provide ex-post (ε,δ)-DP with a privacy cost independent of the number of responses, and demonstrate that both methods outperform standard Best-of-N across multiple models and datasets.
By Ishi Jain, Nandini Bhattad, Sayak Ray Chowdhury
arXiv:2609.37344v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Data reconstruction attacks have empirically been successful in recovering training samples from learned models, raising privacy concerns and motivat...
By Max Cairney-Leeming, Simone Bombari, Marco Mondelli
arXiv:2510.24233v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Deep generative models are often trained on sensitive data, such as genetic sequences, health data, or more broadly, any copyrighted, licensed or p...
By Antoine Szatkownik (TAU, BioInfo), Aur\'elien Decelle (TAU), Beatriz Seoane (TAU), Nicolas B\'ereux (TAU), L\'eo Planche (BioInfo), Guillaume Charpiat (TAU), Burak Yelmen (BioInfo, TAU), Flora Jay (BioInfo, TAU), Cyril Furtlehner (TAU)
arXiv:2607. 16620v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Differential privacy (DP) is increasingly deployed to limit membership inference risk in machine-learning systems.
By Rakshit Naidu
arXiv:2605. 11170v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Noise-based certified machine unlearning currently faces a hard ceiling: the noise magnitude required to certify unlearning typically destroys model utility, particularly for large-scale deletion requests.
By Ahmed Mehdi Inane, Vincent Quirion, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Ioannis Mitliagkas