arXiv:2307. 13127v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Data used to train predictive models via empirical risk minimization (ERM) often contain sensitive personal information.
By Spencer Giddens, Yiwang Zhou, Kevin R. Krull, Tara M. Brinkman, Peter X. K. Song, Fang Liu
arXiv:2505. 22703v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Many problems in trustworthy ML can be expressed as constraints on prediction rates across subpopulations, including group fairness constraints (demographic parity, equalized odds, etc.
By Mohammad Yaghini, Tudor Cebere, Michael Menart, Aur\'elien Bellet, Nicolas Papernot
arXiv:2503. 10945v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Current practices for reporting differential privacy (DP) guarantees for machine learning (ML) algorithms such as DP-SGD provide an incomplete and potentially misleading picture.
By Juan Felipe Gomez, Bogdan Kulynych, Georgios Kaissis, Flavio P. Calmon, Jamie Hayes, Borja Balle, Antti Honkela
arXiv:2410. 06814v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Over-parameterized models are typically vulnerable to membership inference attacks, which aim to determine whether a specific sample is included in the training of a given model.
By Hengxiang Zhang, Qiang Hu, Hongxin Wei
arXiv:2606. 20546v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Differential privacy (DP) ensures rigorous individual-level privacy guarantees against even the most knowledgeable attackers, but its worst-case nature can impose a costly privacy-accuracy tradeoff.
By Linda Lu, Karthik Sridharan
arXiv:2606. 12733v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Privacy auditing provides an important safeguard by estimating the actual information leaked by a model, thus ensuring that theoretical privacy guarantees hold in practice.
By Adya Agrawal, Yu Wei, Jaspal Singh, Malik Magdon-Ismail, Vassilis Zikas
arXiv:2606. 09582v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent work argues for using Gaussian differential privacy (GDP) to report the privacy guarantees in privacy-preserving machine learning.
By Bogdan Kulynych, Antti Honkela
arXiv:2407. 08233v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Current differentially private learning paradigms face a severe utility bottleneck: DP-SGD degrades performance through noise accumulation over training steps, while aggregation-based approaches such as PATE suffer from data inefficiency due to disjoint data partitioning.
By Ding Chen, Haochen Luo, Xiaofei Wang, Chen Liu
arXiv:2607. 23649v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Differential privacy provides formal privacy guarantees for training neural networks on sensitive data, while Bayesian deep learning offers a principled framework for uncertainty-aware prediction.
By Nour Jamoussi, Ikram Dridi, Giuseppe Serra, Marios Kountouris
arXiv:2512. 04008v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Training with differential privacy (DP) guarantees dataset members that they cannot be identified by users of the released model.
By Zo\"e Ruha Bell, Anvith Thudi, Olive Franzese-McLaughlin, Nicolas Papernot, Shafi Goldwasser
arXiv:2605. 27292v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Privacy auditing aims to empirically assess privacy leakage in machine learning models using membership inference attacks (MIAs), and to derive lower bounds on differential privacy (DP) parameters.
By Mathieu Dagr\'eou, Aur\'elien Bellet
arXiv:2606. 17035v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Prior research suggests that differential privacy (DP) inherently enhances the robustness of federated learning (FL) against backdoor attacks.
By Xiaolin Li, Ning Wang, Ninghui Li, Wenhai Sun