The paper introduces a differentially private framework for sparse reward estimation in reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF). It assumes that only a small subset of features influences human preferences and provides theoretical error bounds for both Sample-DP and Label-DP settings under the Bradley-Terry-Luce model. Empirical results show that the proposed methods outperform dense baselines on sentiment generation and safety alignment tasks, achieving a better privacy‑utility trade‑off.
By Meng Ding, Mingxi Lei, Jie Zhang, Jinyan Liu, Di Wang
arXiv:2601. 10237v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) is the dominant paradigm for private training, but its fundamental limitations under worst-case adversarial privacy definitions remain poorly understood.
By Murat Bilgehan Ertan, Marten van Dijk
arXiv:2610.07212v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) trains a language model on problems that may themselves be confidential, and the trained model ca...
By Jiachen Zhao, Antonia Januszewicz, Taeho Jung
arXiv:2601. 14033v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Machine learning models are increasingly served behind APIs.
By Xiaochen Zhu, Mayuri Sridhar, Srinivas Devadas
The paper introduces PAC‑Private Autoregressive Generation, a method that calibrates noise based on ensemble disagreement across overlapping ‘worlds’ of a private corpus, thereby extending PAC privacy from classification to text generation. By training adapters on a frozen public model and using posterior‑weighted disagreement to add noise only when predictions vary, the approach achieves strong privacy guarantees while preserving most of the fine‑tuning benefit. Experiments on WikiText‑103 with GPT‑2‑small show 74 % of the fine‑tuning gain retained with a per‑token budget of 2⁻³², and membership‑inference success bounded to 51.08 % after one million tokens, outperforming PMixED under matched conditions.
By Mina Mirzadehsarcheshmeh, Amir Keyvan Khandani
arXiv:2605. 11170v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Noise-based certified machine unlearning currently faces a hard ceiling: the noise magnitude required to certify unlearning typically destroys model utility, particularly for large-scale deletion requests.
By Ahmed Mehdi Inane, Vincent Quirion, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Ioannis Mitliagkas
arXiv:2606. 01527v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Machine unlearning is motivated by legal and user-facing requirements to remove the influence of individuals' data from trained models, such as the right to be forgotten.
By Matthew Regehr, Gautam Kamath, Andrew Lowy
arXiv:2602. 01607v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Differentially private synthetic data enables the sharing and analysis of sensitive datasets while providing rigorous privacy guarantees for individual contributors.
By Rundong Ding, Yiyun He, Yizhe Zhu
arXiv:2602. 17284v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We consider the privacy amplification properties of a sampling scheme in which a user's data isused in $k$ steps chosen randomly and uniformly from a sequence (or set) of $t$ steps.
By Vitaly Feldman, Moshe Shenfeld
arXiv:2508.04800v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: We introduce a novel privatization framework for high-dimensional controlled variable selection. Our framework enables rigorous False Discove...
By Yuxuan Tao, Adel Javanmard
arXiv:2608. 02480v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: With AI systems gaining more access to individuals' information, it is important to protect privacy when reporting statistical answers.
By Jinwon Sohn, Veronika Ro\v{c}kov\'a
arXiv:2610. 29575v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We consider online prediction from experts, a fundamental problem in machine learning, under differential privacy constraints.
By Bo Li, Peng Ye