arXiv Machine Learning

FactorBench: A Portfolio-Aware Benchmark for Automated Factor Mining

arXiv AI
Sep 10

Alpha-R1: Alpha Screening with LLM Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning

Alpha‑R1 introduces a reinforcement‑learning aligned large language model framework that performs context‑aware alpha screening by semantically gating candidate factors against a dynamic market state description. The model, trained with group relative policy optimization using realized portfolio returns as reward, selects a sparse subset of factors whose economic rationale matches current market conditions. In a 12‑month out‑of‑sample test, Alpha‑R1 achieved annualized returns of 47.87% on the S&P 500 and 40.57% on the CSI 300, with Sharpe ratios of 1.62 and 2.23, demonstrating the effectiveness of semantic factor reranking in non‑stationary markets.

By Zuoyou Jiang, Li Zhao, Rui Sun, Ruohan Sun, Zhongjian Li, Jing Li, Daxin Jiang, Zuo Bai, Cheng Hua
arXiv AI
Sep 25

AlphaDiverse: Post-Training Local Quantitative Research Agents for Diverse Exploration in Alpha Factor Mining

AlphaDiverse is a framework that enhances large language model–based multi‑agent systems for alpha factor mining by addressing cost, availability, and confidentiality constraints. It generates diverse research paths through varied environments and post‑training local agents, then fine‑tunes these agents with supervised learning and optimizes them jointly using a GRPO method that balances predictive quality and diversity. The approach limits research feedback to inner‑period data and evaluates a frozen model on outer‑period data to avoid test‑set tuning, demonstrating competitive prediction and broader exploration across four Chinese stock universes.

By Qingzhuo Wang, Zikun Wei, Zhihua Wei, Wen Shen
arXiv AI
Aug 14

AQuA: Recursively Self-Improving Quantitative Trading Research Agents

arXiv:2608. 12841v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study recursive self-improvement at the level of quantitative-investment research: whether an autonomous system can use evidence from earlier experiments to improve the hypotheses and candidates proposed in later iterations.

By Jiacheng Guo, Suozhi Huang, Yunlong Gao, Zihao Li, Jian Ge, Xu Kuang, Mengdi Wang
arXiv AI
Sep 2

Agentic Empirical Asset Pricing: Methodological Foundations

The paper introduces Agentic Empirical Asset Pricing (AEAP), a framework where autonomous LLM agents conduct the entire scientific discovery process for asset pricing. It outlines AEAP’s core components, critiques current evaluation methods that only test outputs, and proposes a new reference architecture with rigorous standards for factor discovery and out‑of‑sample backtesting. Using this framework, the authors evaluate SEADS against five baselines on US equity panels, finding no single metric consistently ranks the systems and highlighting the need for multi‑axis evaluation and rolling re‑execution to assess reliability of the discovery process.

By Yingjian Pan, Xiaowei Ding, Kay Giesecke