arXiv:2608.30192v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Traditional finance relies on experts to hand-craft factors through a principled process grounded in economic rationale. Recent LLM-based multi-agent s...
By Hyeonjin Kim, Minseok Kim, Seunghyeon Jung, Sujin Pyo, Huisu Jang, Woojin Lee
arXiv:2607. 26642v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automated alpha mining has increasingly adopted large language model (LLM) agents for factor generation and iterative discovery.
By Jingyang Yi, Jian Yang, Yifei Jin, Yuqi Li, Jian Li
Automated alpha mining has increasingly adopted large language model (LLM) agents for factor generation and iterative discovery. However, existing LLM-based systems often delegate both factor construction and search decisions to the agent itself, without an explicit exploration space or a principled mechanism for navigating that space.
Alpha‑R1 introduces a reinforcement‑learning aligned large language model framework that performs context‑aware alpha screening by semantically gating candidate factors against a dynamic market state description. The model, trained with group relative policy optimization using realized portfolio returns as reward, selects a sparse subset of factors whose economic rationale matches current market conditions. In a 12‑month out‑of‑sample test, Alpha‑R1 achieved annualized returns of 47.87% on the S&P 500 and 40.57% on the CSI 300, with Sharpe ratios of 1.62 and 2.23, demonstrating the effectiveness of semantic factor reranking in non‑stationary markets.
By Zuoyou Jiang, Li Zhao, Rui Sun, Ruohan Sun, Zhongjian Li, Jing Li, Daxin Jiang, Zuo Bai, Cheng Hua
arXiv:2608. 12841v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study recursive self-improvement at the level of quantitative-investment research: whether an autonomous system can use evidence from earlier experiments to improve the hypotheses and candidates proposed in later iterations.
By Jiacheng Guo, Suozhi Huang, Yunlong Gao, Zihao Li, Jian Ge, Xu Kuang, Mengdi Wang
arXiv:2508. 13174v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Formula alpha mining, which generates predictive signals from financial data, is critical for quantitative investment.
By Hongjun Ding, Binqi Chen, Jinsheng Huang, Taian Guo, Zhengyang Mao, Guoyi Shao, Lutong Zou, Luchen Liu, Ming Zhang
AI agents are increasingly deployed for professional investment research, yet no benchmark captures the complexity of the full investor workflow. Existing benchmarks mainly target financial data extraction, a narrow slice that current models have largely saturated, while reference-based metrics and generic LLM-as-a-judge scoring fall short on the open-ended, long-form answers that real analyst queries demand.
arXiv:2608. 11683v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI agents are increasingly deployed for professional investment research, yet no benchmark captures the complexity of the full investor workflow.
By Yuhao Zhang, O. Ozan Koyluoglu, Thejas Venkatesh, Richard Diehl Martinez, Vishank Bhatia, Arash Alidoust, Ashwin Paranjape
arXiv:2606. 10412v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid evolution of financial technology demands sophisticated artificial intelligence systems capable of handling diverse challenges across multiple domains simultaneously.
By Fanrong Liu, Zhang Yuwei, Mingni Luo
arXiv:2605. 05580v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Quantitative trading agents have demonstrated substantial promise in automating factor discovery, signal aggregation, and portfolio execution.
By Yishuo Yuan, Jiayi Sheng, Sirui Zeng, Jiaqi Wang, Jiaheng Liu
arXiv:2608. 16386v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Financial agents must do more than recall domain knowledge: they must be both reliable, executing precise operations over grounded evidence, and executive, sustaining long-horizon research whose conclusions remain auditable.
By Agent Team, B. Zhang, Yaze Geng, Lei Tang, Yaoyang Yi, Zonghan Wu, Yifan Hu, Kun Wang, Qingsong Wen, Yilei Shao
We present an interpretable machine learning pipeline to decompose Cross-Sectional Equity Return Predictability into auditable factor contribution. We apply an XGBoost model with TreeSHAP attribution and conduct stress testing on 3632 Chinese A-share stocks from 2009 until 2019.