arXiv AI
FaVOR: LLM-Based Agentic Framework for Factor Mining via Empirical Validation
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Sep 16
FactorEngine: A Program-level Knowledge-Infused Factor Mining Framework for Quantitative Investment
arXiv:2603.16365v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We study alpha factor mining, the automated discovery of predictive signals from noisy, non-stationary market data-under a practical requirement th...
arXiv AI
Oct 15
AlphaRLM: Aligning Language Models for Literature-Grounded Symbolic Factor Discovery
arXiv:2610.14959v2 Announce Type: new Abstract: Formulaic alpha mining seeks to discover executable expressions that capture predictive market signals in a vast, noisy search space. Recent LLM-based...
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 7
FactorBench: A Portfolio-Aware Benchmark for Automated Factor Mining
arXiv:2610.06947v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Factor mining seeks to discover signals from financial data that predict future asset returns and guide portfolio construction. Automated factor mini...
arXiv AI
Sep 10
Alpha-R1: Alpha Screening with LLM Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning
Alpha‑R1 introduces a reinforcement‑learning aligned large language model framework that performs context‑aware alpha screening by semantically gating candidate factors against a dynamic market state description. The model, trained with group relative policy optimization using realized portfolio returns as reward, selects a sparse subset of factors whose economic rationale matches current market conditions. In a 12‑month out‑of‑sample test, Alpha‑R1 achieved annualized returns of 47.87% on the S&P 500 and 40.57% on the CSI 300, with Sharpe ratios of 1.62 and 2.23, demonstrating the effectiveness of semantic factor reranking in non‑stationary markets.
arXiv AI
Aug 14
AQuA: Recursively Self-Improving Quantitative Trading Research Agents
arXiv:2608. 12841v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study recursive self-improvement at the level of quantitative-investment research: whether an autonomous system can use evidence from earlier experiments to improve the hypotheses and candidates proposed in later iterations.
arXiv AI
2d ago
AgenticFinBench: Benchmarking Financial Agents on Diverse Tasks from Real-World Requests
AgenticFinBench is a new benchmark comprising 230 real‑world financial tasks across eight categories, two languages, and four complexity levels, designed to capture the breadth and open‑ended nature of financial AI work. It introduces a reference‑free evaluation framework that uses question‑specific rubrics and a two‑stage claim audit to detect hallucinations, aligning assessment more closely with real‑world financial practice. Experiments on 18 agent configurations show that ignoring hallucinations inflates performance, that harness differences drive evidence grounding more than model differences, and that task complexity reduces quality scores, highlighting challenges in explaining financial impacts and comparing data consistently.