arXiv:2607. 26642v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automated alpha mining has increasingly adopted large language model (LLM) agents for factor generation and iterative discovery.
By Jingyang Yi, Jian Yang, Yifei Jin, Yuqi Li, Jian Li
arXiv:2608. 11250v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language models can propose many plausible trading factors, but an autonomous research system must also allocate its evaluation budget, verify its own evidence, and preserve how each candidate was produced.
By Weicheng Ye, Youran Sun, Xingyu Ren, Shunyao Yu, Chugang Yi, Haizhao Yang
Automated alpha mining has increasingly adopted large language model (LLM) agents for factor generation and iterative discovery. However, existing LLM-based systems often delegate both factor construction and search decisions to the agent itself, without an explicit exploration space or a principled mechanism for navigating that space.
arXiv:2607. 24131v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Classical alpha mining achieves strong risk-adjusted returns by combining many low-correlated predictive signals, yet deep learning stock-ranking methods typically produce a single alpha per stock, rely on increasingly complex architectures with diminishing gains, and obtain diversity only through separate models or implicit routing, without explicitly controlling inter-alpha correlation.
By Yu-Chen Den, Kuan-Yu Chen, Kendro Vincent, Tien-Hao Chang
arXiv:2606. 29194v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automated alpha mining holds the scoring function fixed and varies the search algorithm over it.
By Yuqi Li, Siyuan Liu, Bingjun Liu
arXiv:2605. 05580v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Quantitative trading agents have demonstrated substantial promise in automating factor discovery, signal aggregation, and portfolio execution.
By Yishuo Yuan, Jiayi Sheng, Sirui Zeng, Jiaqi Wang, Jiaheng Liu
arXiv:2607. 12455v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Quantitative strategy optimization remains largely manual, requiring domain experts to identify weak signals, tune risk-control rules, and repeatedly validate iterative revisions.
By Jie Mao, Changlun Li, Xiang Li, Qiqi Duan, Jinhui Yuan, Xiang Liu, Yuyu Luo, Jing Tang, Xiaowen Chu, Nan Tang
arXiv:2602. 02905v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Autonomous agents powered by large language models (LLMs) promise to accelerate scientific discovery end-to-end, but rigorously evaluating their capacity for verifiable discovery remains a central challenge.
By Zhen Wang, Fan Bai, Zhongyan Luo, Jinyan Su, Kaiser Sun, Xinle Yu, Jieyuan Liu, Kun Zhou, Claire Cardie, Mark Dredze, Zhiting Hu, Eric P. Xing
Quantitative strategy optimization remains largely manual, requiring domain experts to identify weak signals, tune risk-control rules, and repeatedly validate iterative revisions. Large language models can accelerate this process, but directly relying on them to rewrite trading strategies often introduces hallucinated edits, strategy drift, and backtest overfitting.
arXiv:2511. 07322v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: While LLMs have shown great success in financial tasks like stock prediction and question answering, their application in fully automating Equity Research Report generation remains uncharted territory.
By Song Jin, Shuqi Li, Shukun Zhang, Rui Yan
arXiv:2606. 10412v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid evolution of financial technology demands sophisticated artificial intelligence systems capable of handling diverse challenges across multiple domains simultaneously.
By Fanrong Liu, Zhang Yuwei, Mingni Luo
arXiv:2502. 18834v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Financial time series (FinTS) record the behavior of human-brain-augmented decision-making, capturing valuable historical information that can be leveraged for profitable investment strategies.
By Yifan Hu, Yuante Li, Peiyuan Liu, Yuxia Zhu, Naiqi Li, Tao Dai, Shu-tao Xia, Dawei Cheng, Changjun Jiang