arXiv Computation and Language

Human-like cross-language generalisation in deep neural speaker embeddings and its acoustic foundations

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 28

Why Better Cross-Lingual Alignment Fails for Better Cross-Lingual Transfer: Case of Encoders

The paper challenges the assumption that improving cross‑lingual alignment automatically enhances cross‑lingual transfer. Using XLM‑R models aligned on token, sentence, and masked‑language‑modeling objectives across four language pairs, the authors evaluate zero‑shot transfer on part‑of‑speech tagging and sentence classification. They find that embedding‑based alignment metrics poorly predict downstream performance and that alignment and task gradients are often nearly orthogonal, especially when operating at different representational levels.

By Yana Veitsman, Yihong Liu, Hinrich Sch\"utze
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 25

VietPrism: A large-scale Vietnamese speech and deepfake corpus with diverse dialects and code-switching

VietPrism is a newly released, large‑scale Vietnamese speech corpus that combines 993.4 hours of real utterances from 1,262 verified speakers with 3.1 k hours of synthetic spoof speech. It uniquely offers transcripts, consistent speaker identities, five dialect groups, and extensive Vietnamese‑English code‑switching—nearly half of the corpus—while pairing each spoof with a matched bona fide utterance. The dataset enables controlled evaluation of deep‑fake detection models, revealing significant variability in detector performance across dialects and speaker similarity.

By Minh Hoang, Thai Le
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 28

Double Trouble: Bilingual Pretraining Leaves Language-Conditioned Effects in Shared-Language Representations

The study compares an English-only and a bilingual decoder-only model, each 310 M parameters, trained on eight diverse languages while controlling for English exposure, compute, and document overlap. After aligning on shared English vocabulary, the authors find that token embeddings appear similar, but the deeper hidden states used for prediction diverge across models. This hidden‑state mismatch grows through middle transformer layers and persists despite controls, indicating that contextual processing differs between the models. "whyItMatters":"The findings show that embedding alignment can conceal significant internal representation differences, which is crucial for any downstream work that assumes aligned multilingual models are interchangeable."

By Anjishnu Mukherjee, Ziwei Zhu, Antonios Anastasopoulos
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 28

Cross-Lingual Alignment Without Joint Training: Do Monolingual Language Models Converge on Universal Representations?

The study investigates whether monolingual language models, trained without joint multilingual objectives, develop cross-lingual alignment. By evaluating models such as Goldfish and independently built monolingual systems, the authors find that alignable representational geometry emerges across layers, strengthening with larger data, larger models, or closer linguistic proximity. A single Procrustes rotation on parallel sentences can map hidden states between models, and applying this rotation to a German model’s residuals swaps factual predictions to those of the donor English model, demonstrating functional transfer.

By Ej Zhou, Suchir Salhan, Catherine Arnett, Anna Korhonen