arXiv Machine Learning
Linguistic Distance Segregates Latent Representations in Automatic Speech Recognition Systems
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
Related stories
arXiv AI
1d ago
Flexible and Interpretable Accent Distance Measurements
The paper introduces a method for measuring accent differences that balances interpretability and practicality. It proposes using articulatory representations obtained via articulatory inversion as an interpretable basis for accent comparison, while employing optimal transport to compare accents across any type of recording. This approach aims to overcome the limitations of traditional phonetic analyses and embedding‑based methods, which are either time‑consuming or non‑interpretable.
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 4
Latent Softmax for Data-Efficient Phoneme-Based Multilingual ASR Across Tonal and Non-Tonal Languages
arXiv:2608. 01281v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Phoneme-based multilingual automatic speech recognition (ASR) can share acoustic evidence across languages more directly than language-specific subword modeling.
arXiv AI
Aug 7
Bias Analysis of L2 Speaking Assessment Systems Using Concept Activation Vectors
arXiv:2608. 06300v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automatic speaking assessment systems are increasingly deployed in high-stakes settings to mark second language (L2) learners' speaking tests, making it critical to show that their scores depend on speaking proficiency rather than irrelevant speaker attributes such as first language (L1) or age.
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 27
Generative vs. Encoder Large Language Models for ASR Evaluation: A Comparative Study
The paper compares encoder‑based and generative decoder‑based large language models for evaluating automatic speech recognition (ASR). It examines BERTScore and SemDist across various LLMs, layers, and pooling strategies, finding that both metrics can strongly correlate with human judgments when properly configured. For generative LLMs, the study explores pairwise hypothesis selection via prompting and direct error classification, showing that while encoder‑based metrics remain competitive, generative models excel in hypothesis comparison and enhance interpretability of ASR evaluation.
arXiv AI
Jul 7
Evaluating the Effect of Linguistic Relatedness on Cross-Lingual Transfer in Large Multilingual Automatic Speech Recognition
arXiv:2607. 04814v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Extending automatic speech recognition (ASR) to low-resource African languages is constrained by the prohibitive demands of data collection at scale.
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 28
Benchmarking_Fast_Domain_Adaptation_for_Unsupervised_Speech_Units
The paper introduces ABX-Accent, a benchmark built on the AESRC dataset that evaluates how well representation learning models adapt to 10 different English accents with less than 10 hours of unlabeled data per accent. It adapts the Zero Resources Challenge ABX metrics for each accent and demonstrates a baseline using adaptive domain normalization to fine‑tune a Contrastive Predictive Coding model, achieving a 23.6% relative improvement on across‑speaker ABX scores compared to non‑adapted models. The dataset and evaluation metrics will be released publicly after the paper is accepted.