arXiv:2608.28691v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Wearable VLM pipelines promise continuous multimodal assistance from egocentric visual capture: a user asks a task-driven question about the surround...
arXiv:2606. 25375v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: With the rapid adoption of generative AI, synthetic medical images pose growing risks, including diagnostic deception and insurance fraud.
The paper introduces MedREAL, a unified framework that aligns linguistic reasoning with spatial grounding for medical visual question answering and segmentation. MedREAL employs Seg Anchored Reasoning Pooling (SARP) to extract semantic evidence from segmentation tokens and a Reasoning-to-Visual (R2V) fusion mechanism to integrate these features into a segmentation pipeline. Using the newly created MedRAVS-13K dataset, MedREAL achieves superior performance, reporting 68.49% gIoU and 70.47% cIoU, and generates evidence masks that consistently match textual diagnoses.
arXiv:2606. 09132v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Visual Language Models (VLMs) have gained significant popularity due to their remarkable ability.
arXiv:2607. 04344v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While Large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) demonstrate remarkable generic capabilities, their clinical reasoning in specialized domains like ocular surface diseases (OSDs) is severely hindered by a paucity of high-fidelity, multimodal instruction-tuning data.
arXiv:2606. 05535v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Medical visual question answering (Med-VQA) has strong potential for clinical decision support by enabling AI models to interpret medical images and answer clinically relevant queries.
arXiv:2608.22363v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Medical visual question answering (VQA) is a crucial task in clinical AI, yet its evaluation has so far centered almost exclusively on English, limitin...
arXiv:2608. 20122v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large multimodal models (LMMs) have demonstrated strong OCR recognition capabilities, yet remain vulnerable to adversarial visual text that is readable to humans but challenging for models to localize and recognize.
With the rapid adoption of generative AI, synthetic medical images pose growing risks, including diagnostic deception and insurance fraud. Although prior work has explored vision-language model (VLM)-based synthetic image detection, these evaluations typically consider images in isolation.
arXiv:2606. 17412v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Pathological images are inherently multi-scale, requiring pathologists to integrate evidence from global tissue architecture at low magnification to cellular morphology at higher magnification for accurate diagnosis.
The paper investigates how much clinical text influences pixel‑level predictions in multimodal medical image segmentation. It shows that segmentation performance is largely insensitive to the choice of fusion module, but that the impact of text varies across datasets: removing text severely degrades performance on BUSI and BTMRI, while it has only a marginal effect on ISIC and Kvasir‑SEG. Using an Evidence Decoupling Decoder, the authors reveal that text mainly modulates global semantic context rather than spatial localization, and that the specific semantic components driving sensitivity differ by dataset.
MedGEN-Bench is a new benchmark for open‑ended multimodal medical generation that addresses limitations in current medical visual benchmarks, such as query‑image misalignment, closed‑ended answer spaces, and text‑centric outputs. The dataset contains 6,422 image‑text pairs across six imaging modalities, 15 clinical tasks, and 27 subtasks, including VQA, image editing, and contextual multimodal generation pairs. Evaluation combines reference‑based fidelity metrics with a structured, checklist‑guided assessment by a medical VLM judge, and preliminary results show that image‑output tasks remain unsaturated while contextual augmentation improves image‑instruction similarity.