This work aims to answer the question of whether it is possible to generate irreversible protected templates when the PolyProtect biometric template protection method is applied to face embeddings usi...
arXiv:2605.03857v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: This work presents a deeper analysis of the "irreversibility" property of PolyProtect, a biometric template protection method initially proposed fo...
By Vedrana Krivoku\'ca Hahn, J\'er\'emy Maceiras, S\'ebastien Marcel
arXiv:2602.02914v4 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Privacy-preserving face recognition (PPFR) and face anonymization have different goals, but both must retain some identity-related information for...
By Wenqi Guo, Qingyun Qian, Mohamed Shehata, Shan Du
arXiv:2607. 17504v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Split face recognition reduces client-side computation but exposes intermediate features to feature inversion attacks and unauthorized analysis by honest-but-curious (HBC) servers.
By Zhihan Ren, Lijun He, Xinyao Wang, Xinzhu Fu, Fan Li
Split face recognition reduces client-side computation but exposes intermediate features to feature inversion attacks and unauthorized analysis by honest-but-curious (HBC) servers. Existing privacy-preserving face recognition methods mainly aim to resist unauthorized reconstruction, typically producing features whose inversion yields visibly degraded results, which may reveal the existence of protection and motivate adaptive attacks.
The paper proposes a defense against watermark forgery in generative models by randomizing the selection of watermark keys for each query and accepting content only if exactly one key detects a watermark. This approach provides a sample‑count‑independent upper bound on forgery success for blind attackers while preserving model utility. Experiments show a dramatic drop in forgery success rates—from 87% to 1% with four keys for text and from 100% to 2% for images—without significant computational overhead.
By Toluwani Aremu, Noor Hussein, Munachiso Nwadike, Samuele Poppi, Jie Zhang, Karthik Nandakumar, Neil Gong, Nils Lukas
arXiv:2606. 18120v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model applications build prompts from templates, and Handlebars is a widely used templating engine and the default prompt-template format in Microsoft Semantic Kernel.
By Mohammadreza Rashidi
The paper presents KVeil, the first‑place solution to the ECCV 2026 LifeGenIP Challenge on Unlearnable Videos. It introduces Reference Capacity Collapse and a Motion‑Guided EOT mechanism for Phase 1, and a two‑layer framework that protects facial and background regions for Phase 2, achieving strong protection against various customization attacks. The methods build on the authors’ prior work LETHE and are publicly available on GitHub.
By Boheng Li, Yueming Xing, Yiming Li, Jie Zhang, Han Qiu, Tianwei Zhang
arXiv:2607. 29144v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Synthetic face datasets are increasingly used to reduce privacy exposure and data access constraints in biometric recognition.
By Pawe{\l} Borsukiewicz, Daniele Lunghi, Wendk\^uuni C. Ou\'edraogo, Jacques Klein, Tegawend\'e F. Bissyand\'e
EXPL-FR is a lightweight adapter that aligns a vision‑language model’s image encoder with a frozen face‑recognition (FR) embedding space, enabling the FR model to be explained using semantic attribute prompts without any text training. By mapping 978 attribute prompts across 22 categories into the FR space, the method identifies the most detectable concepts—forming a readable semantic signature that better separates identities than the full vocabulary. The approach is evaluated on four FR backbones and two VLM encoders, providing identity‑level, per‑image, and differential explanations, and demonstrates that prompt‑driven audits can rank FR models by per‑ethnicity error and attribute‑change verification cost without requiring labeled data.
By Guray Ozgur, Mustafa Efe Tamyapar, Naser Damer, Fadi Boutros
The paper compares four audit methods for assessing identity‑level differential privacy in pre‑trained, black‑box face generators. Each method—GaussMech, KDE‑LR, MMD‑TV, and ROC‑HT—has distinct assumptions, hyperparameters, and finite‑sample limitations, and they produce markedly different epsilon estimates when applied to FaceFusion and InstantID. The study finds that all methods reveal significant identity distinguishability, but none can be reliably ranked in this high‑distinguishability regime, suggesting that future work should evaluate them on partially private mechanisms.
By Arman Zareian Jahromi, Vishnu Bondalakunta, Mohammad Akbar Bin Shah, Naimul Haque, Shuangqing Wei, George T. Amariucai
arXiv:2510. 25687v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Model inversion attacks pose an open challenge to privacy-sensitive applications that use machine learning (ML) models.
By Mallika Prabhakar, Louise Xu, Prateek Saxena